I so desperately want to believe that Q is legit…
However, I see all this shit that he says that points to him being a posturing fraud.
For example, the strange and unnecessary verbiage and codes he uses.
"[p_AUTHORITY1]"… why use such a code? Why not just straight up say "Presidential Authority"… why the 1? If that's some sort of legit code, why use it if no one outside of the team knows what it means?
It smacks of "trying to look sophisticated to lend an air of legitimacy"… Q does this all the time. (e.g.: "DECLAS"… instead of "declassification".) I mean I understand the need to abbreviate… still… he does it unnecessarily ALL the time.
Then there's all the underscore "special code" shit… especially the utterly meaningless shit.
>Check_in_Z[des_TFC]381
>NON_FISA_WARRANT_SPEC_OPS
>WARRANT_SPEC_OPS CLASSIFIED PUBLIC
It all just points to someone who is TRYING to look like he's all official and "look at how on the inside I am… and I'm inviting you to be on the inside too with me… " It's classic scammer/cult behavior. Make the mark (target of the scam) feel like they are privy to special knowledge that no one else is privy to… even though the info is totally fake or "fluffed up" to make it look conspiratorial and like you're being let in on a big secret… in this case, a secret code. Or as Q has hinted at… "Learn our comms"…
Now I totally understand the use of things like LL to indicate Loretta Lynch… or GOOG to indicate "google", and "C_A" to talk about those … [[ahem]] "people"… because you don't want to trip algorithm triggers with the full names.
Anyway, back to the most recent Q post.
Why put the header on it like this?
>Statement release 10.9.18 [p_AUTHORITY1]
>General Statement:
It makes it LOOK official and SOUND official…
When Q could have simply said… "POTUS felt it necessary to remind you…"
The use of the term "General Statement" is utterly unnecessary EXCEPT to sound "official"… I dunno, it all just SCREAMS "PSYOP" with us as the targets.