>3539413 >>3539433
Yes, I agree with you that the PBS interview guy and the sofa buddy are one and the same individual.
However, I do not think Q confirmed the match. If it was a confirmation, it was quite oblique.
At the very least, Q pointed at a broader meaning. IDEN the other person is the first step.
Obtain name is next. We can go with Siddiqui – and most diggers have, I think. An alternative is to obtain name from the photo scenario – what is the name Siddiqui went by, his nickname, as per Hussein? Sid is one.
Another name is that of the photographer, also in the room, right? That name did not seem to take us very far.
Another name, Hussein. Obtain name. What did he go by? In the PBS interview I think the name, Barry, came up, yes? Shortly after Hussein returned from his trip abroad, he started to use Barrack. Could this be what Q was getting at?
No facial hair. Well, lots of angles tried. Perhaps no facial hair while working for Hussein Admin? Perhaps go back to young days, boyhood? Perhaps link to the women in the scene? Girlfriends, sisters, daughters, mothers, and so forth? Hussein's lack of facial hair?
Origin. Origin of what? The relationship between the men on the couch? Origin of the individuals – Siddiqui and Hussein? They met at Occidental in California.
Might as well repeat this in this summary: No facial hair contains the word, California. Plus, HA. Is the name to be obtained? Dunno.
Track history. Again, history of what or whom? Many candidates have come up. But the history of Siddiqui is rather obscure, at this point. It may take someone contacting him and asking a few journalistic questions.
Then all of that leads to security clearances and to a foreign post within the Admin. From what we have on Siddiqui, he does not seem qualified to do much for government, right? Seems more likely a down and out type of fellow in the theatrical scene in NY City. But there may be more there. Hussein did lend him a hand, purportedly, according to both Hussein and Siddiqui.
Could there be someone associated or even related to Siddiqui who got that posting and got an FBI bypass on security clearance?
The security clearance issue itself is quite explosive, I think, in how frequently it was used by the Admin at that time. Perhaps that is the point Q had in mind?
If we step back and think what is the theme that is at issue here, does it require narrow focus on an individual only?
That would be out of keeping with most other digs along these lines. Usually there is a pattern, a broader notion, a network, interconnections.
Thanks Anon. We have more to dig, yes.