And yet Christ died on a cross.
Christian teachings were not compromised, Anon, by the intelligent reworking of pre-existing pagan symbols, myths, and such. It was not Christianity that was remade but rather the pagan traditions.
The timing is necessary for the Saudi purge of its old guard's secret services.
It-is-what-it-is, yes.
NP: "It shouldn't be our original purpose."
But that is all they really have going for them. Damage to those who oppose them, that's their purpose today.
The Dems have dropped all pretense of speaking in code. Clearly they mean what they say when they project and let it reflect themselves.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/coincidence
Know more about Martin Luther and about church history than most, Anon. No matter. Believe as you must.
As have I.
If you have no belief, you have no knowledge.
"It's the economy, stupid" is old half-truth of first BC campaign.
Yes, it is true, the feeling is good when one is free to prosper and to contribute. There is more to it than the stale half-truth of a Prez who prospered without contribution.
If you believe that would be a discussion which would benefit the research we do here, then, your belief is mistaken.
Cheers, Anon, and do as you must.
Agreed, research is vital to accumulation and testing of knowledge.
Belief is more knowledge. Belief is not subtraction from knowledge. Verification is applicable to both knowledge and belief.
Faith, like belief, is more knowledge.
Believe it. Or not. We are in agreement.
If you believe you have knowledge and not belief, then, you are in a self-contradiction. As it is known what you know, it is not known, by you, what you do not know. Yet do you not believe that there is truth even if it is beyond the scope of your knowledge?
It seems to me that you do so believe.
As for the history/origins of the papacy, I do not know the relevancy you believe this has on the research we do here. I do believe you are in earnest and seeking more knowledge in your pursuit of truth. The scope of that discussion is greater than even The Plan that Q has spoken about with Anons.
I would look to the origins/history of Islam for greater insight into what The Plan is up against, Anon. More profit there, I think, based on what I know and believe.
Apart from faith.
Nobody? Your remark would not be honest if taken at face value, Anon. But, yes, there is truth in your truthful hyperbole.
Islam is not merely a middle east thing, of course. And, what The Plan is up against, has more in keeping with the origins/history of Islam than it has with Israel.
Dicks do not enter into it (pun intended).
Q 133
Does Satan exist?
Does the thought of Satan exist?
Who worships Satan?
–
On the other hand:
“Vladimir Putin: The New World Order Worships Satan”
Also Q 133
–
The thought of the Great Satan is alive and well even now in Iran's theocracy.
And the relevancy of the history/origin of the papacy to our research?
Do you believe that the members of the 5 Catholic members of the Supreme Court allow their judicial role to be dictated by the pope?
Based on behavior, it seems there are at least half of the Justices who are not constrained in just that way, Anon.
This may well lead to a slide, I think, but I will leave the last word between us, on this, to you.
RR's non-answers, which he is sure to supply in abundance, will tell us more than he would like us to learn.
Attempted redactions will tells even more.
The answer-answers and the non-redacted transcripts bits and pieces will tells us something but not as much.
So first the struggle to get answers and second the game to un-redact what would be unnecessarily redacted.
RR might surprise.
Which tribe?