Anonymous ID: ae6950 Oct. 20, 2018, 11:02 p.m. No.3550141   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0156

>>3550108

How do you ensure those prosecuted [non military] would receive an impartial judgement based on the RULE OF LAW?

Think Federal Judge rulings [obstruction] [POTUS’ granted CONSTITUTIONAL authority].

How do you ensure 'appeals' to the U.S. Supreme Court are evaluated impartially based on the RULE OF LAW?

Think Justice K (5 to 4).

Military Law v Criminal Law

“Enemy Combatant”

Anonymous ID: ae6950 Oct. 20, 2018, 11:11 p.m. No.3550186   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0202

>>3550156

i am not a law fag.

indictments unsealed… enemy combatants arrested (i suspect detained)… people lose their shit… lawyers appeal for habeas corpus ss pushed to the SC… the SC, which will follow the constitutional law (and current authority of the president) will dismiss these requests.

 

how the hell would i know about the timeline?… but the clean up of the DOJ/FBI/et al that is ongoing is why, i suspect, we are waiting.

Anonymous ID: ae6950 Oct. 20, 2018, 11:19 p.m. No.3550239   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0255

>>3550202

my apologies… did you not see the phone # at the top of the bread?

just call it… they'll pick up, and listen to your formal complaint regarding delays concerning the indictments… and with a little luck you'll have your concern passed on to the Q team.