>>355130

I don't think that is a proper warrant canary. It needs to be passively failsafe. They can't compel you to do something (ie, update it).

Shouldn't it have a statement on how often it is normally updated (eg every 3 months), and a date on when it was last updated?

>>355593

>>355606

The guy has been seated in the Senate. He literally has to be impeached now to fix it. 5D chess?

Are they trying to run out the clock so the Dems don't have time for a backup election cheating plan?

>>355812

>>355769

>>355774

Need better evidence of the plane crash ties to Rosatom/dossier.

Q needs to explain how we were 'over the target'…

Who was the hit on, and how do we validate?

>>355857

>>355880

>>355687

>>355902

I've yet to see any real confirmations of plane-Rosatom name/bio matches.

If they used a fake name/bio, then all bets are off… we don't have enough info.