"Federal election overseers"? Is there any such thing?
ISTR that the laws regarding unsolicited phone calls specifically exempted political speech. This goes back a LONG ways … (almost) as far back as rotary dial up lines.
In other words, political speech gets a free pass to harass your ass.
Addendum: however, I don't know whether text messages are considered the same as voice messages in the eye of the law. Methinks that they probably are or will be.
Recently an old court judgment expired and now Republicans are able to challenge electors at the polling places. I don't know if any are in place yet. (Dems were always able to do so.)
This is not a Federal matter, but is a local party matter.
No, my friend, it is not a nation at all … just pudding for plunder – easy prey for the most vicious attacker. Maybe that is why Q told us to learn Russian?
I have considered the potential for harm and the potential for good which comes from both remaining ignorant of the identity of Q and knowing it. I HAVE "expanded my thinking" and have decided that, at this point in time, it is better that Q be allowed to operate in the shadows.
What concerns me is that, in order to communicate with >us<, Q must necessarily leave clues that malicious others most certainly are pursuing with vigor and intelligence and diligence. In other words, the game WILL come to an end as soon as EITHER party can end it.
This is a two-way shooting range and the other side has resources that are difficult to imagine.
There is one woman in the pic. Red top.