Anonymous ID: 2c1fc4 Oct. 21, 2018, 3:43 p.m. No.3555993   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6046 >>6197 >>6478

Question for BO/BVโ€“ I keep making a thread about Alexis De Tocqueville which explains parts of his classic work "Democracy in America" with a view to debunking mainstream delusions that "they are on the side of history"โ€“ and it keeps getting deleted. Likewise, I posted a thread debunking the "Trump is a Nazi sympathizer" smear, and it got deleted too. I put in quite a bit of work on them, and I think they are worthwhile. In any case, there is certainly no apparent reason to delete them. What gives gentlemen? Could we get an explanation?

Anonymous ID: 2c1fc4 Oct. 21, 2018, 3:54 p.m. No.3556075   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6108

>>3556055

Why would it be worthless to debunk one of the primary smears of anti-Trumpism? Why would it be worthless to fill in the blanks of a history that is being erased by those that hate western civilization, when the claim that we are ignorant is constantly used against us? Why are "The Jewish Supremacy Issue" and "Nimrod World Order" good thread topics, and "Democracy in America" not?

Come on now, anon.

Anonymous ID: 2c1fc4 Oct. 21, 2018, 3:56 p.m. No.3556103   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6193

>>3556046

Really BO, you should answer. Why would it be hard for you to explain that? I frankly think the threads tend to elevate the discourseโ€“ but if you disagree, or have some basis for calling them "shill threads", then I am open to discussing them rationally. Thanks man.

Anonymous ID: 2c1fc4 Oct. 21, 2018, 3:59 p.m. No.3556133   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3556108

Waitโ€“ explain to me why there is piles of garbage that "deserves its own thread", but anything that is higher quality should be either posted in the oil slick that is the general, or else kept on another board that isn't visited. That makes zero sense. Why not let anons that have something to say make threads for ideas that are explained in a longer format? What possible reason could there be for preferrring abject idiocy like "The Jewish Supremacism issue" and the thread about the sun being yellow?

Come on now.

Anonymous ID: 2c1fc4 Oct. 21, 2018, 4:06 p.m. No.3556199   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6221 >>6385

>>3556143

I'm not "Tiresias", and it is EXTREMELY bizarre that posters that act like bots swarm around calling me that whenever I ask BO why I am being censored. I am an anonymous patriot. Period. If you all were as well, you wouldn't be playing these bizarre and creepy games, you would be curious why patriots are being censored, and you wouldn't post in bot-like patterns. Hence, the logical conclusion is that I am being attacked by bots.

That's why I'm asking BO to explain himself. So stop this ridiculous bullshit and let the man speak for himself. He isn't a baby, and this isn't a game. Let's grow up and have adult discussions.

Anonymous ID: 2c1fc4 Oct. 21, 2018, 4:20 p.m. No.3556354   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6428

>>3556316

By outsider, I meant the countless humans that will be liable to notice that the Qresearch board is controlled by a system of bots. They will then understand that the entire "alt right" internet is likelwise dominated; that they have been getting fed sheer lies by the MSM, that Trump is NOT their enemy, and that the corrupt players attacking him actually are. Then it will be game over for you and all you represent.

 

You don't want that, do ya buddy? rofl

Anonymous ID: 2c1fc4 Oct. 21, 2018, 4:21 p.m. No.3556372   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3556349

I wouldn't be too quick to draw any conclusions about BO or this board. But we are here for a reason. But we should be very clear about the fact that there is inexplicable censorship, and heavy botting supporting it. But we ARE here for a reason, and I'm fine with that. BO is a great guy, we just need to resolve this issue.