>>3562123

Seeding bad information, Astroturfing, and Cultivating Tacit Approval.

I don't filter often and when I do, it's because of exactly what you've shared here. I watch for the pattern of behavior over the course of a shit-ton breads and once I'm confident there's some fuckery going down? Filter. Nothing of use or import has been shared, nothing amusing has been posted, just AgendaAgendaAgenda.

Also, it seems kinda malicious (and agenda-y) to tell Anons not to filter what they find useless or otherwise not-okay.

And yes, I'm sure all of this makes me a shill. Whatever.

>>3562228

I've never actually seen any Anons ask you what you think about the topic, though. So, what would compel you to just randomly share what you think re: filtering?

;)

>>3562145

>>3562262

Not all assholes are shills, are they?

>>3562301

However, when civilians choose to put THEMSELVES in harm's way the game changes a little bit, doesn't it?

>>3562334

Weeeeelllll, "disagreeable" is VERY subjective, isn't it?

Not trying to be a cranky contrarian, btw.

>>3562388

"Nope"?

Maybe wasn't clear: I was implying that the folks in this caravan have made a choice to put themselves AND their children into harm's way. (Personal responsibility for their actions and the subsequent outcomes of said actions.)

I think we're on the same team, Fren?

>>3562552

You have no idea what anyone other than yourself is thinking, Anon.

Don't try to think for people with different areas of expertise than your own.

>>3562553

Luckily, there are various alternatives to saying "turn back now or die".

Example: The 82nd doesn't have authority to makes arrests, yet they can be used in that capacity. (Interesting, I know.)

>>3562588

Good save.