Anonymous ID: a34982 Oct. 22, 2018, 9:14 a.m. No.3562505   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3562082, >>3562139, >>3562246, >>3561426 lb

Yeah this Anon goes on and on with this complaint, baker. Wants more news articles included. Problem has already been taken to Meta and BO/BV confirmed a) baker discretion and b) primary diggs over packaged news but he’s not content with that apparently.

Still, it’s a good jumping off point for this issue:

>>3561478 lb

Anons, help make Notables great

While I agree bakers shouldn't put factual claims in notes w/o sauce, fast-moving bread and/or board lag makes that difficult for one person to manage. Experienced anons help by training/slapping newbs. If you or someone else wants something noted, either prompt the OP/nominator to provide whatever’s lacking in a post (sauce or context/explanation), or provide it yourself. Bakers/BO/BV can’t be the sole “authority” or we’re easy targets for shills. If you spread out the threat, you diffuse enemy fire.

 

As to “muh notables” goncerns:

The WHEN is at the time baker notes/fails to note, in specifics. Don’t just bitch long after the fact in vague generalities. The latter is too open to abuse (think Kav), looks the same as shilling.

The HOW is simple, sauced, direct description of both problem and remedy:

Ex. >>[tag to baker] Baker, notable #___ [description] is missing sauce, pls remove if not provided.

>>[tag to anon] Anon, can you sauce this for baker?

-or-

Ex. >>[tag to baker] Baker, pls include this post as sauce for notable #___ [description]

[URL as sauce]

>>[tag to anon] Anon, this is a great find so I grabbed sauce for you. We only note stuff if it’s sauced.

 

Ex. >>[tag to baker] Baker, notable #___ [description] lb is fake and gay. It appears you’re the same baker as lb, can you remove it?

[URL and/or explanation of problem as sauce to support claim that note is fake and gay]

-or-

>>[tag to baker] Baker, notable #___ [description] lb is fake and gay. It appears you’re not the baker that put it in notes, can you add this post as rebuttal to this bread’s notes?

[URL and/or explanation of problem as sauce to support claim that note is fake and gay]

[Fact-based, detailed, & reasoned rebuttal]

 

>>3562145

kek! ty anon