Anonymous ID: 4a19c7 Feb. 12, 2018, 5:20 p.m. No.357281   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7309 >>7358 >>7359 >>7421

>>356793

>>355960

Baker - Delicious Bread

 

I'd like to propose an alternative theory on Snowden, for your consideration.

 

>>346303

 

Attached image relative, there are more with Snowden mentioned by name.

 

What if Snowden isn't an NSA/Mil operation as >346303 theorizes. What if Snowden is a CIA operation.

 

Q's post says Snowden open source leak was +Clowns/-No Such Agency. Saying that the leaks of NSA techniques was a positive for the CIA. Seems believable because the CIA is up to their arm pits in illegal, nefarious activities. If another intelligence agency has access to all digital communication history, they can track their moves. They have every digital communication stored, so they can search history and piece it together. Just like we do from DNC/Podesta. The CIA knew that they couldn't let anyone else have the ability to spy broadly on the entire US broadband network, because they would get caught setting up wars, blackmailing anyone they wanted, killing anyone they didn't want, trafficking drugs and people... whatever.

 

Why did Snowden go to Russia for exile? Who was really colluding with Russia? Who "sold" Russia Uranium? The CIA is seemingly much closer to Russia than the NSA.

 

Snowden is a CIA contractor, and his disclosure was an OP to remove power from the NSA, because the CIA had the same powers, but they do it "secretly". They couldn't allow another agency to gain the power, because they would lose.

 

We Know All. We See All. We Hear All....