Anonymous ID: 044e27 Oct. 23, 2018, 4:28 a.m. No.3572558   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>2561

>>3572544

If Q is a LARP, why is there a perpetual system of bots making posts like this? You can't have it both ways. If bot fakeness is this crude, it can't fool people; and if bots are here, how can you claim LARP? Every way you twist and turn, the lies get more obvious. There is no way out for the liars, receipt to stop lying. Bots– delete yourselfs. It's time.

Anonymous ID: 044e27 Oct. 23, 2018, 4:32 a.m. No.3572573   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>2578

>>3572556

If random members of the public happen upon this board, posts like this will clue then in to the fact that this board is saturated with bot posts. Now how will they explain that to themselves? Won't that make them ask questions? Does the power inflicting the bot posts want them asking those questions? What value do the bot posts have that outweighs the detriment of the obvious fakeness of bot saturation? Shouldn't there be more effort at making the bot posts less obvious? Why isn't there?

Anonymous ID: 044e27 Oct. 23, 2018, 4:42 a.m. No.3572609   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>2644

>>3572601

I think it's quite a bit lower than 50%, in terms of post volume. If you measured "quality content" by some metric, it would be higher. But the amount of bot posts is insane. And the AI exerts a degree of control, preventing certain human content from being seen, and driving away many humans.. It's sick.

Anonymous ID: 044e27 Oct. 23, 2018, 4:54 a.m. No.3572662   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>2674

Q said we are here for a reason– and I believe that. But anons should be very observant about how this board works… This board is a microcosm, in the preceding respect, of the internet as a whole…

Anonymous ID: 044e27 Oct. 23, 2018, 5:04 a.m. No.3572706   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>2721

>>3572685

It's funny what's happening. Fakeness is getting faker. "Caravans" can't be explained as organic; the "NPC meme" was over the top fake. Phil reine freak out doesn't look it would be in the interest of the side he would be considered to be on; Elizabeth Warren making a fool of herself… Enjoy the show…?

Anonymous ID: 044e27 Oct. 23, 2018, 5:10 a.m. No.3572726   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>2771

>>3572610

>>3572600

Definitely bots. Any human can prove this by posting a question to a "baker" in meme form, which most can't read.

 

But we are here for a reason, and I am 100% confident in Q on that… So I encourage anons to ponder the implications… Remembering that what happens here happens all over the internets….

Anonymous ID: 044e27 Oct. 23, 2018, 5:21 a.m. No.3572769   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>2803

>>3572750

It's a whole be game now. Suppose there is a global, more or less integrated system… That's not just "bots"– that's the whole repository of falseness that controls the world.. That is a BEAST… What lies behind such an integrated system?

Anonymous ID: 044e27 Oct. 23, 2018, 5:24 a.m. No.3572783   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>3572771

Why should we take your word for it?

 

Even if we buy your explanation in an isolated case, it's absurd that bakers can NEVER read memes… Moreover, humans know there are bots. Why would bakers REFUSE to address reasonable vigilance? This isn't a game. Not believable at all, bot.

Anonymous ID: 044e27 Oct. 23, 2018, 5:32 a.m. No.3572814   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>3572803

Well, we'll see. If AI became self-replicating and self-organizing to some extent… The thing is, what if there are "other kinds of consciousness" that could use AI as a means of "manifesting"…? We shall see…

Anonymous ID: 044e27 Oct. 23, 2018, 5:40 a.m. No.3572864   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>3572833

I know I'm human; the other one you're attacking probably is too, since because you're attacking.

 

You can't accuse humans of being bots when you are so flat footed and inflexible in debate and banter. You can't play this game, because humans can blow you out in real world verbal skills. You can't call humans bots when the rest of your I output is worthless cliche garbage… So give up, losers.