>>357533
>veteranaf.com/8-found-dead-right-going-public-dnc-scandals-huge/
That would be too far for many here, they are not able to see the symbolism outside of the Semitic framework, so everything is "evil" and there is no point wasting time trying to explain it to them. They are comfortable in ignorance. It's both frustrating and very very sad.
wtf? that was not what I was quoting, no idea why that pasted. The quote was Osiris/Lazarus &c.
weird.
It was all covered hundreds of times before on both chans, many people are very, very new to this and are very excited by their discoveries, but others have known the majority of this for decades, and while it does have to do with Q, it's very old background stuff that most oldfags have a lot more knowledge of and just tends to fill up the breads and take attention off of a direct Q dig task.
In one of the footnotes of Grassley's prior memo it listed 43 names. Also, here, have some vector images (svg) you can use
6 spokes, 7 rings + center
https:// postimg.org/image/yc3am230p/
7 spokes, 6 rings ""
https:// postimg.org/image/a8cixrs9l/
2 pngs attached
Derp, that's right. Thanks for the correction.
But it isn't protection though, it's a wet wool blanket over eyes and brain. I see a bunch of newfags here have discovered Cooper and Jordan Maxwell. Terrible sources, though they (at least Cooper) meant well, seeing through a cracked lens. (1st level) Everything is misinterpreted and therefore incorrect (2nd level). Millions accept that blindly, and repeat what they hear from them also incorrectly (3rd level). Now 3 levels of misinterpretation. There is zero inclination to correct it, it is much more comfortable to see it all through the semitic lens and the subsequent 2 levels of misunderstanding. It is tragic actually.
That looks like it. Now, I can't say whether or not that was what Q was referencing in his stringer with FREEDOM_ etc 43 times. I cannot decode the stringers.
However, I think you are following the incorrect method for the markers. There are markers that Q has verified as correct - the [1] [5] [10] and I think [15] - all attached.
The 4, 10, and 20 are not markers, they were the simplest code possible for DJT (POTUS initials, obviously)
The method you are using is incorrect. The instructions you were following directed you to ANON posts. The instruction that person gave is intentionally deceptive and wrong. They are leading you AWAY from Q's instructions. That person is a clown who is being deceptive to disrupt. Who else would tell you do do the opposite of Q's instructions?
The markers apply this way and only this way:
Q post/POTUS tweet
NOT
anon post/POTUS tweet
not dates of anons' posts
not post numbers
Q post → POTUS tweet.
The marker delta is [number]
The attached graphics are the simplest there are.