Not Notable Baker
Notable only for those who never studied the event
3576803 The "shooter " is a fiction. How could this be notable. Just like a note left behind at a fake "suicide" Written by the crappy writers at Langley to keep the fake story afloat.
Read up on it. It's a slide. Anons already know about this
Baker made it notable. Whatever,
Probably a tag team of shill.
One to float it
And the other to write:
"This is really exciting"
No it's not.
It's just more fake news.
It's not even on the subject of a "Q" question.
Definitely a slide and Not Notable
Anyone who believes that alleged person killed a mess of children.. Gotta be totally stupid.
Cant read?
Can't research?
Especially after all the work that's been done .
on the case.
An airplane crashed a Shanksville too.
Y'all make me laugh.
Too many years have gone by.
Too much water under the bridge.
Wake the fuck up.
Turn It Off.
Probably. What a coincidence!
The picture they used of "him" wasn't artificially generated. It was the "older brother"
A photo of him when he was younger.
They used that.
Just as they used younger images of the living children to represent the alleged dead.
That's why they originally arrested and named the "older brother" as the shooter
They always fuck up.
And boy did they fuck up on this one.
There could be a family resemblance with Hogg.
Funny how someone comes on right away to argue against that? Why?
Nothing was stated.
It was only images shown.
Reminds me of how "Jones" exploded when he wasn't named but mention was just made to "beware of who you follow. some are just after money"
Then Jones - Hicks explodes,
Why?
Also yeah the actors are all the same crowd, maybe even the same extended family?
And it's a relatively small clique of criminals.
The "mother" didn't die.
They are all frauds C-A FBI Cabal
3577298
Dude is misrepresenting.
And cherry-picking.
Wow are the criminals ever scared of this Sandy hook fraud getting exposed?.
You betchs
It's so close too. So many thousands of people have studied it.
Hi shill.
No, all autists /anons who do research would know this already.
Full books have been written.
I know some anons are idiots.
But whatever, you take what you get.
However, for some reason the shills have come here to try to misdirect on Sandy Hook research?
What are they afraid of?
Baker is a shill.
"Also, anyone who appeals to anons like this:
>Anons already know about this
Is being dishonest. The desired reaction being "of course I knew that already."
Doesn't know my motive for saving what I'm saying but accuses me of being a shill.
He who smelt it, dealt it.