Anonymous ID: 63fa93 Feb. 12, 2018, 7:22 p.m. No.358545   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>358519

>Can't be a coincidence that this stuff just shows up like this.

well… there were those spoopy street video stills. Those just showed up. Didn't turn out to be anything.

 

Clearly more effort has been put in to craft these. Don't mean they're worth anyone's time for it…

Anonymous ID: 63fa93 Feb. 12, 2018, 7:29 p.m. No.358600   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>358572

great initiative/work to harvest posts & create a thread.

now if only moar anons would do that.

Looking at you, cat herders and whiners who try and tell anons what to do and how, and demand this or that be dug: this is how you do it. You pick up your subject, go ahead, and there you go, you're actually doing something, others actually likely to jump in

Anonymous ID: 63fa93 Feb. 12, 2018, 7:51 p.m. No.358818   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>358802

suggestion, add a little pepe in there somewhere, since you're reposting. We have to suffer the originals already, so if we're going to have even more of it…

Anonymous ID: 63fa93 Feb. 12, 2018, 8:06 p.m. No.358953   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>358909 >>358444

too much brushtool (darkening) when editing?

not consistent with shadow

not consistent with other hand

actually, holyfuck, their relative positions don't make sense when you zoom in, and they're supposed to just be standing next to each other (looking at feet/heights).

there's that dark outline of (DougBand)'s hand that doesn't make much lighting sense either, but smells shop.

Anonymous ID: 63fa93 Feb. 12, 2018, 8:14 p.m. No.359033   🗄️.is 🔗kun

maybe that's the main reason for the odd, distracting mural:

it's odd and distracting.

if it was just a boring wall, or non-descript painting, any/all irregularities would pop up much more

 

>>358993

>>358970

>>358940

>>hostages

that would explain much regarding the nebulous story of that whole trip: hostage situation. This pic being the equivalent of hostages holding newspapers forced to smile and pretend everything is fine… ?