>>3584124

You know how they claim that all the theories about what he does with his money is a conspiracy? Well what about how he obtained all of this money. Because I'm no expert, but I'm pretty sure its in ways that any liberal would disagree with if presented to them on their own. It points to how subverted they are that they can be convinced to vouch support for a 'liberal' billionaire and still show support for their socialist causes. I thought they wanted to eat the rich. What happened to that?