Today's Q post about the white substance letter being received and saying it was a warning letter after "our attack on big pharma" doesn't make sense to me.

How would it be known that is the case? I seriously doubt the proper forensics has been done that quickly to even know the source.

To me, it just doesn't add up and is pure speculation. The only thing that can justify the statement is one of the following:

1) Q took the liberty to grandstand and is just BSing and playing up the big pharma narrative. If this is the case, how much else is BS?

2) The letter that came with it was so obvious where it came from and what the purpose was. If this is the case, will it be made public?

and 3) It is related to Assange and it could all be staged.

Well if USSS is going to do their job to the fullest, they would need to get a sample of the substance from Assange for a full-out investigation to see if this is just one-time occurrence or if a pattern is there.

This transaction of getting the substance to USSS can open the door for something else. Something else ranging from trading intel to giving Assange his underground exit from the Embassy.