Enjoy the show, Anon.
>Holder's package was mailed to the wrong address, according to law enforcement officials, and it wound up being sent back to Wasserman Schultz's address, where it was intercepted by the Secret Service.
What are the odds of a returned package arriving at the exact same time the other packages were being properly delivered? I'm no expert on the postal system, but wouldn't returning a package back to sender add another day or two of transit time?
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/suspicious-package-found-near-new-york-home-bill-hillary-clinton-n923816
>Good guys put "false flags" on bombs.
I'm so mad at myself for not catching this earlier. Bravo. I think you're on to something, Anon.
I like this theory, but…
Why would CNN still tweet pictures of an obviously fake bomb? Too scared to deviate from the script? Sheer desperation to sell a distraction? Or simply because they're CNN?
Alternative theory:
White hats conducting investigations need to raid the buildings where the bombs were sent, but don't want to cause public panic. Fake bomb story is concocted to be used as cover.