Updated Bomb incident theories
Sorry in advance this may be a large posting.
1: The lone mentally ill individual
Most likely outcome to be reported by news
1a: The media will most likely report that this was a lone individual who sent these bombs in a skewed political ideological attempt to harm these political figures. Expect the blame to be placed on Trump for his divisive rhetoric targeting these people and they may try to tie this into the Qanon movement. Expect many articles about the trolls on 4chan becoming a real world threat, activities moving offline, etc.
>Be prepared to counter this narrative. We have always been the movement of law and order knowing violence IS NOT part of the movement. We all know how these people want to portray us.
1b: when they find the individual responsible, don't be surprised if he "blows himself up" similar to the Austin bomber.
1c: The news is reporting that the explosives in the devices are a powder. The most likely powder would be gun powder. Every manufacturer in the country has to add small traces of an identifying marker in their powder. It would be easily traceable back to the makers of the powder. Any fingerprints, dna would also be collected. And lets not forget, the devices were sent through the mail. Bar codes would trace it back to its originating postal office immediately. We are looking at having much more information within the next 24-48hrs.
1d: How did one person hand deliver all those packages within the space of a day? How did they coordinate it so that packages sent to return address happened on same day as hand delivered ones arrived? The media appears to be heading towards the single bomber theory, but the inconsistencies in the timeline don't add up.
2: The victim card
>Expect these people to try and garner sympathy in an attempt to influence the election
2a: The Kav hearings, the Kashuggi murder, the caravan have all failed to influence the political narrative in favor of the dems. This is their next attempt to swing the overton window back in their favor.
2b: We know George Soros has bad actors at his beck and call (look back to the election when he had several organizations hiring people to disrupt and attack rallies). He may be the funder for this.
2c: Q has called out 4 booms, this may have been the attempt to tie this into the Qanon movement and frame Q as the bomber.
2d: with the addition of the false flag (fake isis flag), and no alarm (clock with no timer or alarm functions) it appears this whole thing was setup as a ploy to garner attention. Lets not forget that the cnn mailroom person opened the package, positioned the device, took pictures, flipped the thing over, and took more pictures. EXTREME handling for a "explosive device". Who the f would do something like that if they were truly concerned about it exploding?
2e: We believe that there is a message in the misspellings. We have seen the CNN photos and the address to Eric Holder (misspelled middle name?). I believe that based on how differently these photos are being treated (with addresses blurred) we are missing a part of the misspellings. And it was intentionally done so we cant see the message in whole.
REMEMBER - MISSPELLINGS MATTER
3: This was an FBI sting
>The FBI found an individual who was wanting to do this. We know they have infiltrated many of the radical leftist organizations. This may have been a sting operation designed to out the groups attempting to setup a false flag.
3a: Fox news reported that the bombs were missing the trigger devices and as we have seen, the clocks used, would not function as a timer. If this was a lone individual, why would they not add that critical part? These "bombs" may have had components of a bomb, but was missing the crucial piece to make it effective. Explains why the soros employee was able to handle, open, and carry the device without it going off. We know the FBI has done this in the past during sting operations.
3b: if this was a FBI sting, the news coverage on this is going to make it impossible to hide. We may see the next backfire on the dems, prior to the election.
Regardless of how this plays out, we need to be prepared to dig and archive at a moments notice. If it was bad actors, they may already be scrubbing their digital fingerprints. I would pit money on it that right now, there is a whole backstory being created. WE NEED TO FIND THE HOLES. Based on past precedent, we know that revisions on the net (especially hurried) are sloppy.
Find the facts
Find the connections
Find the truth