>>4269023

So now that there is a CE-5 dedicated thread, it is logical to expect Greershill should NOT be making anymore posts here.

CE-5 will be left unchallenged in that thread.

People can be left to their own devices with an unchallenged narrative and one sided ways of thinking.

Since the only material (((they))) source is CE-5, there is absolutely no reason to continue posting here.

If Greershill continues to post on this thread, it only PROVES that (((they))) are trying to control this discussion.

That (((they))) want to use the "shills handbook" to stall any conversations that dig into real truths.

>>4270179

>>4270371

Notice the alien LARPer / slide is supporting Greershill and CE-5?

Working in a team.

Distract?

Divide?

Derail?

Coincidence?

>>4269385

>Grier is a self-proclaimed follower of … JOHN PODESTA. He is funded in part by THE ROCKEFELLERS. The faggot says it himself. he is fake and gay and the first to get the rope.

>>4266728

>I see the alternate alien thread was removed, despite Anons utilizing it.

>What does this tell you?

Perhaps the BO / BV's noticed something they didn't?

Maybe they noticed some shillery?

Maybe they figured the thread served no purpose when this one already exists?

>When will people stop mentally masturbating to UFO lore and put down the computer and initiaite contact on their own?

Anons have been doing exactly that.

The same Anons that called you out for sourcing one sided material and narrow minded ways of thinking.

For parroting disinfo.

For parroting /badactors/.

Anons ARE making contact, without you and your gatekeeping.

"Muh Authority"

>IT IS YOUR BIRTHRIGHT TO KNOW THE TRUTH, ANONS

Correct.

Which is specifically why you are steering away from the truth at every turn?

(Just throw some more CE-5 videos in there that anybody can find online, and steer back to Greer. That'll make everything go away).

>>4268298

>We are with you, anon.

That message was directed at Q.

Did you really just answer that question insinuating you're on the Q Team?

Why do you say "we"?

Are you speaking on behalf of the Anons here?

>>4270435

>So now that there is a CE-5 dedicated thread, it is logical to expect Greershill should NOT be making anymore posts here.

>CE-5 will be left unchallenged in that thread.

>People can be left to their own devices with an unchallenged narrative and one sided ways of thinking.

>Since the only material (((they))) source is CE-5, there is absolutely no reason to continue posting here.

>If Greershill continues to post on this thread, it only PROVES that (((they))) are trying to control this discussion.

Makes sense.

Let's see if (((they))) post again…