>copy/pasta description from prior thread

Q's answer to the "Are we alone?" question as well as confirmation of the existence of programs related to moon landings outside of the public domain proves it would be wise to research these topics further.

Discuss them in this thread so we don't clutter the generals.

Proving UFOs, extraterrestrials and Special Access Projects are real is similar to proving deep state is real. The buildup of many coincidences and "softer" proofs like notable high ranking officials saying "weird" things, having documents revealed or seeing (and feeling!) unexplained lights (either coincidentally or by your own accord - CE-5) is the current degree of proof. This prevents mental conflict among people that are not ready for this Truth but provides those that are awakened with confirmation, similar to how Q operates.

Always use discernment. Don't just spam your info, make sure it's at least logically sound, reasonable and backed with what little facts we have. All rules of physics and logic apply in all cases, even if it's not understandable from our limited perspective. This is a serious research thread even though many will still dismiss all talk about the matter out of ignorance and various belief systems. OP Mockingbird is in full effect here - be prepared.

Respect your fellow anons. Do not fight, search for Truth. See how small pieces fit in the big puzzle. Present, but do not persuade. And remember, our Universe is infinite.

Thread #1 Link: https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/256741.html

Thread #2 Link: Deleted???

Thread #3 Link: https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/3166229.html

Two interesting data points re: Jason Rice, Gaia's Cosmic Disclosure (CD) series latest guest.

1. I believe it was CD S12:Ep8 "Reaction to the German Breakaway Civilization" in which Jason Rice stated that in 1984 or 1985 the Cabal stole an important piece of equipment/technology from the German breakaway group, "mind wipe technology". According to Rice, the story goes that three CIA agents and two KGB agents infiltrated and took control of a German transport vessel, stole the technology, put some sort of bomb on the craft and did a high-altitude low opening parachute jump. The craft was destroyed, and it took a bit of time for the Germans to figure out what happened, but when they did, they sought retaliation against the Cabal (i.e. the United States and the USSR) in two coordinated attacks. The first attack, which most believe was an accident, is the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster, which transpired on January 28th, 1986. The second attack, which again, most believe was an accident, was the Chernobyl disaster, which occurred on April 25-26, 1986.

What Jason doesn't mention, and something that really activates the almonds when you think about it is the timing of these two "accidents". The first one occurs in January, the first month of the year, and the second one occurs in April, the fourth month of the year. Combine the number of those two months, January (1) and April (4), and you get 14. According to Wikipedia, the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster happened at 16:39 UTC, January 28th, 1986, and the Chernobyl disaster began at 22:23 UTC, April 25, 1986, which means these two events occurred 87 days and about 6 hours apart. If you round 87 up, you get 88. Combine the 14 with the 88 and you get 1488… https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteen_Words

The timing of these two "accidents" is quite the 'coincidence', and seems to offer some extraneous validation of Rice's testimony.

>>3600822

1. Some of Rice's testimony in CD S12:Ep10 "Advanced Weapons and Combat Technology" talks about a weapon called the Condensate Phase Difference Diffusor Platform (aka the "Static Gun"). The summary of what Rice said about this weapon system is provided in the first image. What Rice didn't mention, is that based on publicly available evidence, it seems quite likely that we all have witnessed the usage of this technology before, about 17 years ago… You can look into the works of John Hutchison and Dr. Judy Wood for more information about that.

>>3600827

I'd like to finish up with saying that there are some that are skeptical of Jason Rice's testimony, and there seems to be a bit of a schism between him and Corey Goode, especially since Goode's lawyer sent Rice a cease and desist order for "unauthorized use of Mr. James Corey Goode's protected terms 'SSP', '20 and Back' and related terms." I can sort of understand where Goode is coming from, not wanting disinformation purveyors to take bits and piece of his own testimony and repacking them in order to sell a bill of goods, especially since that documentary he helped produce, Above Majestic, is due to come out in less than a week. HOWEVER, I'm in agreement with Rice when he states:

"No one owns these terms or programs, nor the efforts to bring this information forward. To trademark and thus control or restrict use of the terms “20 & back”, “SSP”, “Secret Space Program”, “and “countless other topics and areas of interest” by Corey Goode is contrary to what the Truth Seeking community has been working towards for decades."

I hope Goode refrains from threatening to, or actually going through with taking legal action against Rice or anyone else who uses the term "SSP", because that is a sure-fire to divide the community, it comes across as unprofessional, and it definitely seems to be a 'service-to-self' rather than a 'service-to-others' type of move. Plus, such a move casts doubt on Goode's own testimony, since SSP skeptics (e.g. the imho pompous douche Richard Dolan, who has called this happening a "fiasco") can use it to argue that Goode is making it all up for money. And what about other legitimate seeming "SSP" and "20 & back" insiders/whistleblowers (e.g. Randy Cramer and Tony Rodriguez)–should they engage in self-censorship and stop using such terminology?

I've got to give credit where credit is due re: Rice, because he recently did an interview with the YouTube personality Joe from the Carolinas, who comes across as an in-your-face over-the-top debunking shill. HOWEVER, Rice answered every question Joe asked, including the questioned Joe posed that were from the live chat. Rice seemed pretty forthcoming and really seemed to hold his own. You can watch that interview here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9EWzkxueus

Also, for what it's worth, Rice spoke of QAnon in a very positive light in the FADE TO BLACK radio interview he did with Jimmy Church earlier this month: https://youtube/watch?v=nmlVgBMPUGw

>>3600878

Jason Rice has really been put through the wringer

And he's really held his own

This anon just really feels that Goode and Sather haven't given him a fair shake

In fact, they've been pretty hostile towards the guy

Pretty much making their feelings that they think Rice is LARPin' publicly known

From before [Goode] and right after Rice's first Cosmic Disclosure episode aired [Sather]

After "evaluating" Rice as a phony, and pretty much shafting him, Sather then tweets his advice about who Rice should and shouldn't be "cozying up to"?

Yeah, I thought it was a bit questionable that Rice did an interview with someone who really comes across as disinfo shill, but his ability to withstand some of the toughest scrutiny I've seen any alleged SSP whistlerblower/insider face speaks volumes

Goode, Rice and Sather are all well aware of and following Q, and possibly lurking here right now

"They want you DIVIDED…"

So, WWG1WGA?

or, where we go one we go cabal?

Now think about this logically…

Option A: Corey Goode pursues legal action against SOME individuals (e.g. Jason Rice) for using terms he's tried to copyright, but not others (e.g. Randy Cramer and Tony Rodriguez)

That would make him a gatekeeper

If you're on Goode's good side–if he thinks you're legit, or just wants to give you a pass to use the “20 & back”, “SSP”, “Secret Space Program”, and “countless other topics and areas of interest” in your broadcasts, then it's all g homie

But if you ain't on Goode's good side, you may end up getting sued

In other words, it would demonstrate that Goode plays favorites

Why should Goode have the right to intimidate/police/bully all alleged insiders/whistlerblowers talking 'SSP'?

Option B: Corey Goode pursues legal action against ALL individuals for using terms he's tried to copyright

That make him a HUGE douche, and I feel like he would quickly lose most of his support from the community

There are a considerable number of people with online podcasts, presentations, blog posts etc. about the 'SSP' topic

Getting a cease and desist letter or being slapped with a lawsuit just for using the term "Secret Space Program" as part of your testimony or including it in the title of a video you upload is pretty draconion

Option C: Corey Goode pursues NO legal action against anyone for using terms he's tried to copyright, and perhaps going so far as to drop the copyright claims and issuing a public apology

As tough as it can be to admit when you're wrong, I think that this option is not only in the best interest of the community at large, but also in Goode's best interest

I can respect him if he comes out and says he made a mistake, we're only human. It would be hard for me to continue to respect him if he's attacking (via legal threats and lawsuits) all these other perfectly decent seeming self-proclaimed SSP insiders/whistlerblowers, and in essence, limiting the disclosure dialogue and discouraging others from stepping forward

Option D: ???

I agree with Rice: NOBODY OWNS DISCLOSURE

#NoSSPTM