>>3881067
>Please explain for us normies how to make contact? "Lasers" isn't adequate. "Lasers" are dangerous, can blind >pilots, can result in prison time, and remove the element of consciousness from the equation. Please explain how >contact is successfully initiated by humans. You conveniently forgot to mention this part.
Yeah, I think you're a shill. I've been watching this quietly and you're steering the conversation.
You read like an infomercial.
To others reading:
<It's simple people, try it yourselves!
Don't take anyone's word for it, just go do it.
Get a handheld laser, nothing too fancy. Clear your mind. Find a clear night, be responsible and make sure air traffic is a clear as it can be. If you can't do that locally, go where you can. I had to wait until 3:30AM in my area a few nights. And you know what? It worked. All it took was some prayer, belief, and calling out "hello" in my mind.
Don't want to use a laser? Try a high powered light. Or a strobe light.
What protocols did I need to do that? Did I need a spiffy title, some powerpoint briefings and to purchase a dvd in order to do it properly? No.
A fancy backstory?
Nope. Just an anon.
All it takes is belief and effort. Not purchasing the latest protocol.
But there's a buck to be made here, eh?
Information wants to be free, shill. Quit gate-keeping.
Want to spot some bullshit in the disclosure movement? Look and see if the information's unreasonably gated.
>Where's the evidence?
Buy this book.
>Where's the evidence?
Buy this movie.
>Can anyone do this on their own?
No, you need to follow our patented, copyrighted, trademarked method
>Can anyone do this on their own?
No. Good lord don't do that! We can't you thinking for yourselves, you'd ignore us!
If you want to try ce-5, have at it. Notice I don't tell you what is and isn't proper.