>Q has an agenda as well. Not all "agendas" are negative.
The 63 post Chinese letters lying famefag pushing known cabal disinfo agents has a negative agenda.
Not that I should have to detail that at this point.
It should be obvious.
Are you trying to defend the faggot?
Your statement is moot.
>Why do you think we say "Trust the plan"?
Who is "we"?
Who are YOU speaking on behalf of now?
Are you speaking on behalf of Q, or Anons?
Patriots who do what they say and keep their word?
Humble seekers?
Or famefags who deliberately slide the breads with widely known false information from the Rockefeller initiative?
This thread is getting derailed in a serious way.
Starting to think the 63 post shill is using multiple devices to defend himself.
Hey, whatever happened to the "Anon" who claimed to bake previous breads?
Still waiting for confirmation on that.