Anonymous ID: 4f2ccb Oct. 25, 2018, 8:20 p.m. No.3607595   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7617 >>7673

>>3606049 old bread

 

Working on the comms of the other side is difficult without feedback, esp confirmations, but Q did suggest doing such analysis when Q deciphered Brennan remarks.

 

QUOTE

 

JC Tweet Translation:

Special Agent Andrew McCabe stood tall over the last 8 months [DO NOT TALK], when small people [SHEEP] were trying to tear down an institution we all depend on [COVER]. He served with distinction for two decades [WE OWN YOU & YOUR FAMILY]. I wish Andy well [187]. I also wish continued strength for the rest of the FBI [GENERAL THREAT TO OTHERS]. America needs you [ACTIVATE SLEEPER CELLS].

 

unQUOTE

 

Q 545 was a rare example of Q comm instructing anons about external comms, of course.

 

Meanwhile the interplay with POTUS tweets is encouraging to consider these as inside comms, yes? If there is only Q, then, POTUS Twattering is within Q comms, yes?

Anonymous ID: 4f2ccb Oct. 25, 2018, 8:43 p.m. No.3607806   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7822 >>7872 >>8116 >>8201

>>3607594

 

What are the criteria for labeling some notion a conspiracy theory while not also labeling the MSM theme of attributing a direct line fault from these deliveries to the speechifying and the tweeing of POTUS?

 

One is conspiracy theory and the other is not? Difference is?

 

Meanwhile the question is what to make of the available evidence.

 

  1. Ten deliveries with same From labels and same basic packaging.

 

  1. Nine deliveries to politicos and one to a movie actor.

 

  1. Dud rate of 100%.

 

  1. No detonation devices – neither remote controlled, nor timed, nor triggered.

 

  1. Reportedly handled by USPS but n available images there are no signs of Postal Service handling of the packages.

 

  1. Reportedly also handled by couriers hired by recipients who have mail screened routinely.

 

Points 5 and 6 are murky but appear to be substantiated in multiple reports attributed to Admin spokespersons. But also nameless sources close to investigation.

 

Anons, can we list other confirmed, or verifiable, facts or describe confirmed or verifiable evidence?

 

Differences between packages?

Delivery or discovered dates and times?

 

The interest in this is in recognizing opportunity to challenge, shape, narrative?

Anonymous ID: 4f2ccb Oct. 25, 2018, 9:06 p.m. No.3608062   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8097

>>3608007

 

Acosta is a bridge?

 

Where USSS are involved, they secure the scene and call in the FBI who conducts investigation.

 

So who got the images for Acosta if not the members of the USSS and FBI? In the various locations?

 

It will come to light, eventually, if these images are genuine or staged (pre-staged).