With all that's going on in Canada, I wonder how long they'll keep those low-crime stats….
Is there a schedule for how long it will take for this to come up in their dockets?
Some of it looks good on the surface. But there are some gotchas in there that diminish sovereignty of nations. Globalism.
Part of the trick of obfuscating their true intent, perhaps? People are suckers for pretty words and good intent. Look at the Paris Climate Accord, for instance. Just try telling anyone that what's in it is actually bad for the planet. How many of them realize that the document requires the chemtrailing that so many object to? Fire fighters believe that chemtrailing made the recent fires in California almost unstoppable. The metal dust from the chemtrailing increased the flammability of the trees. How can destruction of the forests possibly be good for global warming, if it's actually a thing? Forests are made of trees, which are plants that convert CO2 into O2. Those fires destroyed the very thing that can reduce CO2. And yet, when people even suggest that the Paris Climate Accord is not good for the nation, planet, or whatever, they're told that they're anti-environment.
Even if we don't require any kind of reimbursement, it could ultimately be a good deal for all involved.
Do you have a cap? He must have deleted it before my favorite POTUS tweet archive site could get it.
If 3 is a true win-win, then 4 isn't necessary.
Seconded. Shark egg cases. It isn't human trash of any kind.
If you're getting taken advantage of, it isn't win-win. In win-win, both gain.
This one is on the archive site, too. I didn't see anyone post an exact time for it. Anons saw the first one in notifications, but it was gone by the time they clicked it to view it. And once a notification is clicked, aren't they gone for good?
What about tear gas?
Is "presidential" behavior defined anywhere? What's their standard? Is it in some etiquette book? I wonder how early presidents would have stacked up to their standard. For the most part, I like how Pres. Trump is doing his job. And when I didn't, I found him to be quite responsive to tweeted messages (not a personal response, but a change that reflected the concerns); and that's all around good. He is as he said, the People's president.
KEK! Would be even funnier (and not) if she actually said it.
Yeah, and my usual archive source missed that one. Maybe another one caught it? (Are there others?)
There's also that part about the DOJ being corrupt. A bunch of those pedophiles arrested in CA were let go, you know. That's part of the hold up. The judiciary needs some fixing. What good are arrests if no one will prosecute?
By the way, that's a good reason to start at the bottom. Get some low level arrests to test the system before going after the king pins.
Anon, I appreciate what you're trying to do. But if you really want to be effective, I suggest that you look up Mark Taylor's comments on target focused prayer. The Lord's Prayer that Jesus gave us was meant to be more of a template.
And yet, they're pushing these ideas on our kids as if they should be normal.
Hmmm… Yeah, OK. TMI.
The comment wasn't even about that. If the reason one is praying is so that the elections go well, for instance, shouldn't something about how you want the election to go be in the prayer somewhere? And if LP is a template, then the proper place for the request is after giving thanks for something. I'm actually trying to help him be more effective. If all he does is recite the Lord's Prayer without getting to the heart of the matter being prayed about, it's kind of like firing a gun without aiming it at anything.
That last sentence disproves the one before it. You realize that, right?
And where do you think the gods got the DNA?
I suggest you go find an interlinear Bible comparison site and reread the Genesis creation story. In some places, the word translated to God is actually plural. And in some places the story refers to "us". Who is "us"?
Michael S. Heiser looked into it. Did his dissertation on the topic, actually. The trinity explanation doesn't always fit. There's a bigger picture here, and the translation into English obscures it.