>>3609838

Destroying another's argument does not require a blunt instrument (ridicule).

Although we as anons are at "war," we do not advocate physical violence; that is central to our work here and reiterated many times by anons.

Not useful to create manifestos that potentially make us the target of their vitriol. Especially now.

And not necessary. Meme "wars" are going very well; NPC is very witty, amusing, and (so sad) infuriating to those who have no sense of humor. Magnificent memes now shatter the opposition.

Travel light, like the Swamp Fox, Francis Marion.

>>3609838

RE-POST WITH MEME:

Destroying another's argument does not require a blunt instrument (ridicule).

Although we as anons are at "war," we do not advocate physical violence; that is central to our work here and reiterated many times by anons.

Not useful to create manifestos that potentially make us the target of their vitriol. Especially now.

And not necessary. Meme "wars" are going very well; NPC is very witty, amusing, and (so sad) infuriating to those who have no sense of humor. Magnificent memes now shatter the opposition.

Travel light, like the Swamp Fox, Francis Marion.

>>3609838

>>3609661

Third and last re-post of my original argument in favor of satire as opposed to ridicule:

Sorry to dissent, but I don't buy the idea of weaponized ridicule as an accurate description of meme warfare. I don't think that's what Q is about, because ridicule has a malicious edge that does not preclude and may encourage gratuitous cruelty/sadism.

What we properly do is political satire. See the difference:

Ridicule = the act of making fun of someone or something in a cruel or harsh way : mean or unkind comments or behavior

Satire = the use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people's stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues

The goal of satire is both to point out the stupidity of a certain act or course of action. But it doesn't preclude the idea that the target can change, based upon the feedback given. Even when the goal is to change the minds of a third party audience, ridicule can turn them against you, because it's mean-spirited (you know, the "kick em when they're down" idea).

In a war, optics matter. A model based on satirical attack is superior to one based on ridicule.

>>3609920

The last time I heard the term "left wing" on TV, it was part of the phrase "left-wing agitators," ~ 1968. It's been awhile.

Yes, better than what we came up with last night. Six flags….like Disneyland. Another kiddie park. Pointer?