>>3612141

Ok I don't see any "Q" related large graphics on the van. What we are seeing in the back of the van could be 4ch or pol as well. Discussion now on Fox about the stickers and what that may tell us about this guy. I have the strongest intuition that they will still keep the "Q" story silent. Just too much proof here and if they give us that sort of attention, many will come forward and ask even more questions.

Either way they will have no choice because there are many more people on this board and aware of Q than the MSM will ever admit to..

>>3612384

The other consideration in this story is that apparently this dude acted alone. To paint one person as a crazy Q conspiricist will not help them make the whole operation look bad.

One guy doing crazy shit doesn't define a whole group.

>>3612488

Anon I understand why you disagree, but its been proven over and over again that when you try to define a group by the bad actions of one person who may be affiliated or claims to be part of a group the entire group will defend themselves as a whole. Back to my original post, that (they) regardless of their ability to spin will stop at mentioning Q because then that opens the floodgates of inquiry and questions as to "Who is Q" which they have worked very hard not to bring to the mainstream. There have been many anti-Q articles that got absolutely no traction and when they try to tell so many closet Q followers that this dude is a radical following the Q conspiracy, many will ask the question, Well who is Q, what has he done, what has said what does he stand for, how do you know its this or that?

This they fear more than anything and that is why Q told us to get them to Ask the question.