>>3629795 pb
HRC and Biden just CLAIMED they saw the van.
No proof
"Mailed to the State Dept."
Who says so?
State Dept.. I get it. All right. Now I believe it.
No. more cruddy script-writing.
They are trying to pin their reputations upon vouching for this dude's reality
So since they say it, everyone believes it.
"Oh HRC and Biden, they would not lie"
It's such a stretch that it should enter the realm of "cartoon narrative" for those sensitive to such things.
>>3629926 pb
It's a good guess.
MOS also did Beiruit bombing [notice all the extreme emotion after 35 years when Pres. Donald Trump memorialized it. I wonder why, now? Could the real culprits be facing consequences behind the scenes?]
Also, they did one of the first major ones - to give excuse for blanket bombing Lebanon, that is:
the '72 Munich Olympics kidnappings and Media event
Neo-Cons [duel citizens who studied together at Univ. of Chicago, who were cult members of a Leo Strauss philosophical school] were who plotted 9/11 , for the most part. They were the policy nerds behind it.
I'm not a "Jews did it" person.
But it's way less than crazy to think the one today was just as "fake" / simulated as all the others.
"Male Bombs" weren't a hoax , right? per Wray
So the words for it are hard to come by.
Folks don't understand it, since they don't believe it's in the realm of possibility. And there's no name for it, therefore, in the common lexicon.
We gotta come up with new language.
"Propaganda simulation"?
Does not imply no one died, though in many cases those who supposedly died did not, and those would-be witnesses, who knew the truth, they would perish, die, "accidentally" afterward.