Anonymous ID: 93fab1 Oct. 28, 2018, 7:23 a.m. No.3638083   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8092 >>8095 >>8102

>>3638069

 

Could have been painted. point is that the removal of windshield wipers is not concrete evidence of a paint job. i.e: just because there are no wipers does not mean fresh paint. If there are more indicators of paint job, then that is a different story.

Anonymous ID: 93fab1 Oct. 28, 2018, 7:26 a.m. No.3638109   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8126

>>3638095

 

Outed..Haha..As what, someone with common sense?

 

Re-read posts…fuck….IF there are indications of a new paint job, then there was a new paint job…IF there are no windshield wipers, that does NOT mean a new paint job, which was what was originally proposed.

Anonymous ID: 93fab1 Oct. 28, 2018, 7:28 a.m. No.3638127   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3638102

 

Roger that. That's evidence that is needed to support the claim of a new paint job. Not just the removal of windshield wipers. Which is what the OP stated.