>>3643450

VIPanon sends anons HAPPY ANNIVERSARY MESSAGE from Q+ on 10.28

Q Post #1028

5:5

Q+

Coincidence?

"NO WORDS"

>>3643983

>>3644017

>I am not buying the VIP Anon connection

>I do not believe he is what he is trying to appear to be

are you suggesting that he faked the (((+)))?

>>3644049

>great graphic anon, but I wouldn't rely the proof on the post#, it can change/be wrong

>its a proof without the post# imo

Excellent point anon. I was just searching for all "+" in Qposts and saw that 1028 and was like WHOA!

But of course, it could just be another coincidence ;-)

>>3644141

>I honestly don't know

>The thought did occur to me though

>I have never felt trust for this person

>Something is just off

that's interesting…I wish you could pinpoint what seems "off" because he is one of the few anons that seems legit to me. He doesn't post much and he doesn't seem to be looking for fame or money. He seems rather humble, but then again I don't follow him on twitter either, so maybe there is something I've missed.

Also, Q actually posted his tweeter, before he even knew he was famous.