Thank you, Baker!
Adding another classy one to the "Classic Edition".
Thank you, Baker!
Adding another classy one to the "Classic Edition".
Agreed. He's the pimp version of CPL.
Red Hat had been a "commercial" branch in the open source realm. Their corresponding "non-commercial" distro is Fedora.
So, from that point of view, I completely agree that for Red Hat that's a big thing (wish I had their stocks now … kek), and they can reach more customers + deliver better solutions to more professional/larger customers via IBM.
At this point can't agree with >>3644485 , as the open-source, free community will always be vigilant, and find ways to develop & publish OS'es that are non-compromised.
From what I see, this whole "they're going after the open-source" hysteria, is likely just that.
>3644948
Hey shill – just cut it out, please.
From what you post, everybody who knows more than just a little about IT can see that you have no clue and are only trying to stoke up emotions – for no reason, and w/o effect.
Switch IPs and topic, and maybe you'll do better earning the few dollars they pay you.