>>3647392

>+1 vote to make this the new bread graphic.

No

>>3647420

>Can you at least give him a like? KEk

Actually I can't

CBTS was long ago and thankfully so

What drama and BS that all was

>>3647466

>I wasn't seriously suggesting the picture be changed.

My apologies then

In that case I agree 100%

>>3647483

>got timestamp for OTJ?

There is a one min video clip here / can hear audio as well

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6327037/Trump-waves-serpent-staff-Melania-pass-chocolate-treats-Halloween.html

>>3647623

>Of course that link cuts off right before the Ode to Joy.

>Shocker.

Does it?

I seriously doubt it was intentional

I posted that article with pics of POTUS in 4526

>>3644441

>>3647598

>nobody expects him until after election day, vis-a-vis the hatch act.

I don't believe this has anything to do with Q not posting

>>3647873

>Neon must draw credible conclusions to receive this level of shilling.

I don't really recall anything about him

I just might not have been paying attention, but I don't recall that level of drama around whomever neon is

>>3647908

What if it reaches the point of rabid dems trying to block people from voting?

>>3647959

Q NEVER said what picture

Your graphic is speculation only, nothing more

There is ZERO proof

None Nada Zip

That POTUS signed (((+)))

So stop with the speculative graphics until and unless Q confirms anything

>>3648027

>yea, I've heard you say that, for the past few breads

And I will keep doing so because you have zero proof and and trying to force something that is not confirmed

You are making graphics that are are false and will likely be used by MSM to write some bullshit article harmful to Q Anon or POTUS

But you know that don't you?