dChan
Anonymous ID: 41f2a5 Oct. 28, 2018, 9:28 p.m. No.3647450   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7766

So, in regard to the frequent mentions of the Hatch Act being the reason for no prosecutions, I continue to disagree.

 

The act prohibits political activity by federal employees such as wearing campaign pins while on duty.

 

There are several categories of employees who must adhere to varying degrees of restrictions under the act. Nowhere does it state, or is it inferred, that law enforcement and prosecutors doing their jobs is considered political activity prohibited by the act.

 

In fact, if the DOJ was found to have no justification for delaying prosecutions until after elections other than not tainting voters' opinions of the DNC candidates that they might vote for, that would be a more likely Hatch Act violation. Even that would be a questionable violation.

 

"THE FEDERAL PROSECUTOR"

An Address by

ROBERT H. JACKSON,

Attorney General of the United states

 

www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/ag/legacy/2011/09/16/04-01-1940.pdf

 

In this address, Jackson stated that while prosecutors must naturally choose which cases to prosecute due to ever present limited manpower and funds, the prosecutor should prosecute every crime that insults the national integrity.

Anonymous ID: 41f2a5 Oct. 28, 2018, 9:59 p.m. No.3647724   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7794

>>3647647

 

I'm not the biggest Q fan here, but a little explanation goes a long way when shills abound. Hey, maybe you thought Q+ was the alien overlords. I don't fucking know. Anyway, I apologize for holding you up for your Barry's Bath House massage.

Anonymous ID: 41f2a5 Oct. 28, 2018, 10:25 p.m. No.3647929   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7944

>>3647864

 

I gotta step in for the anti-Q side here. Maybe that anon researched during Pizzagate to see nothing happen, now it's not happening again, at least in a way that can definitively prove that Q is working for Trump. Trusting Trump and trusting Q are two very different things. An anonymous poster might be required to show overwhelming affiliation with MAGA compared to Trump, who we've gotten to know more and more. But Trump was significantly transparent, straightforward from the start, and so it gets better. Same can't be said for Q. Q's diversion tactics are like a pattern, for example.

Anonymous ID: 41f2a5 Oct. 28, 2018, 10:35 p.m. No.3648016   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8030

>>3647977

Followers doesn't indicate substance of a theory or movement. Look at Scientology. Anons still cite the Hatch Act after I, a lawfag, have disputed the theory several times, most significantly in this very bread. But not too many here want facts. They want to imagine a superhero comic book story unfolding on this board. Like if I imagine it, it will become. Anons on the fence about Q, or even anti-Q, come here because it's hot, it's happening here