anons realize that when Q used (((brackets))) that DID in fact refer to jews - as explained in the notables

so look WHAT message was (((enclosed))) in the "jew highlight" text?

thats right - WWG1WGA AND POTUS +++

understand the comms?

could not be MOAR clear - jews are INCLUDED in WE THE PEOPLE

Not only this it also validates vipanon

POTUS sent quite a message all right

WWG1WGA means just that

NO GROUP EXCLUDED

ONLY EVIL PEOPLE EXCLUDED

SAUCE

BREAD 4629

>>3646908 History and meaning of (((triple parentheses)))

MUHJOO SHITPOSTER

"CANT WE DISCUSS THE JEWS"

Q/POTUS ANSWER

(((WWG1WGA)))

comms clear?

prolly not so here ya go:

"discuss" jews all you like but do not attempt to DIVIDE jews as a class of persons for scorn or hate - seems obvious unless you are a fanboy gab follower of the synagogue shooter

>>3648130

less than 10

3 non military

i recall

>>3648188

Q expressly stated those running were doing so for political cover to defend vs their own crimes

she is candidate #1 in that category anon

>>3648207

just one anon

and its a dodo

>>3648224

>some kind of test facility

no

more like a terrarium

>>3648233

huh? me?

okay……………………………

>>3648259

terrarium

its described in the bible

and the whole history of "the gods" ("elohim" is plural even in the bible) is described in the sumerian tablets

gods = aliens

jews = top servants of the aliens who recorded all their shit they did on that time period (since the last global conflagration about 5000 years back (think terrarium cleaning)

its not for everyone

>>3648299

>Q team doesn't need our digs, we need them

not exactly true anon

while Q does not needs intel from us - our digs are hive mind and nurture the expansion of consciousness for the GA

Q cannot do that w/o us

>>3648313

exactly

the big lie is taking the literal parts of the bible as metaphor. and vice versa

in plain sight it is

>>3648314

everyone

unless you are lucky enough to have a syzygy

>>3648319

anything you like anon - its all good

>>3648348

please read the constitution

POTUS is civilian

>>3648382

that post post is mumbo jumbo

no evidence

no sauce

woo woo

>>3648399

no but it makes very clear that the executive branch is NOT military and that the military is under civilian command of the CIC

MANY SCOTUS cases on this anon

(lawfag)

>>3648418

>>3648407

NOW its a slide

research scotus cases

POTUS is civilian

>>3648437

first search result proves lawfag right (me)

Commander in Chief Powers | Wex Legal Dictionary / Encyclopedia …

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/commander_in_chief_powers

… that the Founders gave the President the title to preserve civilian supremacy over the military, not … As the U.S. Supreme Court explained in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer,