All Last Bread.

>>3649579

I don't even understand what you are trying to prove here. But the gateway process sounds interesting.

Doesn't prove God though.

>>3649588

Nope, will not dare to say any of that is coincidental.

But it still doesn't prove God.

>>3649594

I agree.

Problem is when people here are talking about God, they either need to define God each time or people will assume you mean Organized Religion God.

So all of these religiotards that tell me i'm stupid for not believing, only cite from organized religion.

>>3649628

I lean strongly towards your definition, but I also know that we can't prove (beyond a surface level) that this is the case either.

>>3649651

Exactly.

But then it 's not proof is it?

>>3649683

No. It doesn't.

Proof is not subjective by definition. Therefore proving things to myself but not being able to show others the same proof makes it not proof.

>>3650212

Imho. We shouldn't assume anything about God as we as absolutely no way of knowing.

So assuming these things just stifles our knowledge.

>>3650235

…as we have* no way of knowing…

>>3650301

>>3650314

>We could be on to something with this phone booth thing.

There seems to be a theme at least.

>>3650310

>>3650301