TY Baker!!!

>>3650978 (lb)

>>3651010 (lb)

>>3651109 (lb)

>>3651154 (lb)

OK, this seems highly plausible. Best explanations I've seen so far

Thank you, anons, for clearing this up. So, rephrased:

Otto Von Bismark hooked Mary Vetsera up with Kaiser Wilhelm of Hohenzollern. She got pregnant.

Mary was then hidden, and name changed to Klara Hitler

Gave birth to Adolf

Years passed, and his niece, Angela "Geli" Raubal, lived with him (in Munich).

Adolf impregnated her. She died after birth of her daughter, whom she named Herlind.

Herlind was given up for adoption.

Herlind had a daughter, also. Angela Merkel.

This is really interesting to me:

"Merkel was supposed to oversee the EU and USA merger with the Soviet Union, but…

Some clever Russians smashed this Illuminati plan in 1991."

Would love to see some sauce on this! Again, thank you, anons!

>>3651226

Working through a summary for Merkel/Hitler relationship right now. The other anon that linked Brzezinski's work already shows a game plan for eastern expansion by the EU, so that was a nice confirmation there.

>>3651242

This is awesome!

>>3651529

>>3651537

>>3651564

>>3651569

He couldn't put Q on there because that would have just ended the discussion right there. What do we know about this photo and the binder it was included in?

1. It was an official POTUS photo op

2. It was an official Executive Branch Photo Binder

3. It has writing on the back that anyone could have written

4. VIP Anon has been referenced by Q with a prediction of a photo, and that photo arrived on Q's one-year annivesary/birthday/whatever you want to call it

As with all other "proofs" to this date, it's proof enough for anons, but just distant enough from POTUS as to be conceivably a really well done "LARP". Q is very specific about how this has to go down. The MSM has to ask the question, of POTUS, and get the confirmation. Once that's done, the MSM will be broken for the foreseeable future.

>>3651653

Name? Background? Bloodline?

>>3651679

>>3651686

Looks like they handed the party over to someone that's going to see it dwindle. I wonder what party we should really be watching now?

>>3651678

>>3651687

>>3651741

OK, watch this:

Hey, MSM;

You do realize that if you ask POTUS the Q question, you might have a case at the Hatch Act.

There. Bait set. Let's see if anyone nibbles.

>>3651785

>>3651797

If the MSM thinks they can get Trump (and Q) on a technicality, then we should be pushing them to ask the question based on the constitutionality of it anyway. We're law abiding, here, and if Q has violated the Hatch Act, then by golly George, the MSM needs to ask the question.

It's a win-win. MSM can finally ensnare the slippery POTUS, and anons get their answer to why we've been here for over a year. Everyone gets an early Christmas.

All the media has to do is ask!