>>3651905 (lb)
LOL. Reminds me of:
>>3651905 (lb)
LOL. Reminds me of:
Almost all of them are controlled opposition. Lee S. and his band of law and journalism "experts" are pro-MAGA, and wholly anti-Q. There is no reason to be anti-Q. There has been zero evidence to suggest Q's intentions have ever been sinister. I'm very skeptical of anyone with a public platform that is vehemently anti-Q.
>and am writing a story on the relationship between anti-semitism and white nationalist groups in America.
>and would like to get comments from the #QAnon โmovementโ.
That's not what we do here. You'll get some theories, but nothing concrete because this isn't an anti-Semitic movement. This is a truth movement.
Wasn't a graphic. Was a statement about potential geopolitical relationships in the future once it's been revealed (to the public) the espionage that the US has incurred since the end of WWII.
There is nothing to suggest Martial Law is part of Q's "plan".
There are hundreds of lobbies with tens of millions of dollars flowing into our political machine. Some have influences that are strictly political, while others are certainly cultural. No one group, in particular, is being fingered here.
There are powerful individuals and corporations (for-profit and otherwise) that do engage heavily in geopolitical allegiances and strategies. Framing the search for knowledge as anti-Semitic is an attempt at diversion.
Now I know that this is a shill post, but I'm going to take a gamble here. Why don't you do your job, and ask POTUS about Q directly?
>They are using our playbook against us
Not quite, but he's not 100% incorrect. If the result of freeing people's minds can be viewed as flipping the script on subjugation and practices of manipulation using identity politics, then it's very telling of their intentions all along.
This right here should be all anyone needs to see, should they still doubt that there's a war on your mind.
You and the Monica Bellucci shill aren't going to win this. I hope you realize that.