Anonymous ID: ef6f36 Oct. 29, 2018, 10:55 a.m. No.3652726   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3652501

I know, I usually shouldn't reply to anons like you, but is the statement: "Think Mirror.", "Optics" that hard to understand? There was enough proof posted on what Q said. Trump also gave many hints already during his recent rallies. If all that does not help you to understand, then feel free to leave this board and lurk somewhere else. First off, if Q were to give actual, classified information, you should be aware that this would violate several laws and could backfire hard, especially during election campaigns. Q holds back on purpose.

Also, don't forget that this is a whole new area of "information war". Or do you recognize a similar full year operation as this one? I don't. But feel free to refute me on this point.

 

>Q and the plan screwed Americans with inaccurate and even fraudulent information

Inaccurate? Fraudulent? I am sorry. But that's a blatant and embarassing lie by you. No info Q gave was "inaccurate" or "fraudulent", in fact it didn't even have an accuracy. And think again why. I explained it already. Q asked legitimate questions, that should lead us to our own conclusions about the situation that is currently present in MSM and more. If we were correct, Q confirmed it by either asking more questions specifically related towards the answers we anons gave.

 

But I am aware that for anons like you, it is hard to grasp all of this. And that is why this place isn't really for everyone. Whatever you say. Your statements are not based on facts and on what's proven already, but simply that no arrests have happened yet and you feel disappointed. In fact, your emotions played you, which made you giving that statement.

 

Trump cannot identify or confirm Q yet. It simply wouldn't work and backfire hard. Goodbye, anon. And believe whatever you want to believe. But we use facts and reason. Cryptography is also just one major aspect of it. And it's not even complicated, if some anons would re-read crumbs instead of chatting here.

Anonymous ID: ef6f36 Oct. 29, 2018, 11:14 a.m. No.3652926   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3092

>>3652871

I disagree. And it was explained many times already. I cannot say I know 100% how politics work. But it's only logical to assume that if a country like Israel has all its ties and hands in the US, it's gonna be really hard to get rid of them without risking your own country getting destroyed. So, there has to be a plan and a strategy to get rid of them effectively but without acting suspicious.

 

Whatever you might answer to this. You can't deny that big hard fact. Trump can't just go and call out Israel for its zionist projects publicly; If he would do that, he would put all Americans into risk and danger of being attacked continously, even harder than right now. And Trump always said that protection of US is first priority. So, it would backfire hard if Trump does publicly call out Israel and even mean that we lose Trump. In Conclusion: Keep your enemies close. God damnit. You even learn that shit from all the movies.

 

>>3652918

Exactly this.

Anonymous ID: ef6f36 Oct. 29, 2018, 11:22 a.m. No.3653009   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3652958

This is very old news. Pied Piper strategy. The idea was by Hillary Clinton. But failed miserably. Or are you talking of something different? If so, then be aware that I won't believe you until you can provide evidence. If not, then goodbye.