Wray is very specific in how he speaks.
I saw it when he was questioned by Congress.
It's lawyerly.
He said it was not a hoax.
But he also said the bombs did not work.
Resolve.
When you are attempting to talk about simulations the language gets very tricky.
We ran into that with people calling 9/11 a "hoax"
That word "hoax" triggers people.
As if it wasn't real. Since everyone experienced it themselves.
So we had to think of new language to be understood.
"False Flag" imples a warfare technique used to trigger a war; So, that work is not completely correct when you are trying to talk about an on-going Propaganda GLADIO-x campaign.
I learned from reading a book on Logic that "NOT" word is very confusion to people.. They can't picture a "NOT" and that gets in the way of comprehension.
So "no planes" - there's an implicit block there to understandin built in that phrase. No one can visualize that.
So HOAX is the wrong word to use for what happened. Perhaps "Hoax" has a legal definition that was not appropriate for the description of this event.
Perhaps Wray is proscribed by law and by his supervisor RR from telling the public about a Propaganda event aided itself by some members of the SES . US gov. Contractors. FBI , who knows?
So I didn't feel the denial of "Hoax" meant the same thing as other people assumed.
And of course with misdirection the speakers knows they will be mis-understood, and that's why they phrase it the way they do.