Last Bread
Here comes the censorship. The real shills don't want to discuss grammar and logic, so they call your posts spam.
Why did Q not just say "fake" when asked if R is real or fake?
Why did Q not just say "fake" when asked if R is real or fake?
He answered "fake" directly in response to at least six other questions.
Oh, but logically and grammatically it certainly is not straightforward. It is clearly not an answer to the question asked.
I am presenting a sound logical argument for the sake of the newbies you speak of and the thousands of lurkers - and especially the great, sincere R researchers who were bullied of of the main board and tricked by the shills into taking a back seat and then having their work deleted.
Is it possible he implied that the interrogator should not be suggesting a "movement split?"
"There is only Q" could mean "Where We Go 1 We Go All," or "there is no such thing as a 'movement split.'"
Yes, he did not need to call attention to it. He could have pointed out other articles to illustrate the fake news hits.
Logically and grammatically you know you can't say Q denied R. You can weasel around all you want shill.
Thank you. I appreciate it. I am here to show the real patriots out there that the shills cannot run everyone off at will and have their way with this board. It is free speech. I will stay and fight.
That was certainly not me. Nice try, shill. Anybody who has read a few of my posts knows that's not me. It wouldn't make any sense anyway, me arguing that R is real and all.
Good point. Except I believe Q uses logic and syntax; and I am one to analyze logic and syntax. So I personally do care who posted it.
Counter my logical argument. Are you saying Q directly answered the question? Are you saying that 'there' does not have a double meaning?
I know, Anon. Believe me I know. My skin has grown thicker and thicker over the last year. What can I say?
What if they knew it was they only way they could possible stay alive and live a reasonably happy life?
I know the answer. You just have to admit it, but you won't. It's very basic 2nd-grade grammar.
Let's have a real conversation applying grammar and logical principles to the matter of whether R is real or fake and what Q said about it.
I don't trust you, because when I ask you to present evidence, you say, "trust me" and then present no evidence.