>>3662877 (lb about getting back to the board and task at hand)

As long as the work anons do gets recognized. Last night dug half dozen times and provided vids/articles/meme’d and all. 2 times i had my digs noticed.. woke up to find articles linked last night actually notable this morning.. w less work than i did last night.

So yeah would like to see game faces put on and do some work. That said it cant be dig only.. that was just as bad in reverse. Used to not be able to really “talk” about subjects w/o being told we werent digging enough.. equally as bad imho.

Too many want to just run their mouth and not provide any other means of substance.

If i spend time digging, getting links, screenshotting and posting up.. it would be nice to get a noteable nod.. sucks to find someone in same bread who didnt see you already posted.. posting up then getting a noteable for it.

Dig what Im saying?

>>3663793

So since 1987.. going to dig

>>3663845

Hell yeah, thanks for sauz.. she was blocked for a 3rd term as Mayor in 1987.. gotta dig on her husbands companies right then. Reason i am digging on this, it actually coincides w/ Clinton’s and their dealings w china while gov of arkansas.. as soon as he(they) got into whitehouse they were immediately trying to sell US secrets to China. First of which was the satellite tech to seperate payloads from rockets (exploding bolts and other) but was blocked till 1997.. which happened to be when Gore/Clintons/+5 others were told about China trying to influence elections. In 1997 is when Clinton Foundation was started..

We just need to dig all the stuff they did with and for china up

>>3663968

💥Noteable💥

Hussein/Clinton/Panetta wiretap citizens in twisted plot to protect info on Usama Bin Laden/collect reward info (so they say.. think moar four keeping his info secret, their tapping allowed counterintelligence on folks w knowledge of whereabouts to protect their protection of UBL)