US missionaries in Haiti charged with kidnapping

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvTqqYCb-e8

Sunday Night’s Matt Doran goes undercover with Operation Underground Railroad to bring down Haiti child sex ring

https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/tv/current-affairs/sunday-nights-matt-doran-goes-undercover-with-operation-underground-railroad-to-bring-down-haiti-child-sex-ring/news-story/dcecf5950ca5b6d501c48ed927127bc3

"Child trafficking victims who’ve spent their formative years servicing the carnal desires of men, often foreigners, who are three, four, five or six times their age. Their madam tells me that many of their customers are western humanitarian workers who’ve come here to help rebuild Haiti after the recent run of natural disasters."

The more you know…

>>3664264

>23:23

Co-rrect.

>>3664414

That post wasn't Q. Q replied to that post with a correction (highlighted). How many times must this be said?

>>3664466

It's REALLY easy. Simply follow ID:gb953qGI (some anon) vs. ID:BQ7V3bcW (Q) on said bread, and compare

>>3664541

You're making this much more complex than it actually is.

Orange: Anon's post

Blue: Q's reply to anon's post

Simple, easy format when read correctly

>>3664582

QMap GMT

>>3664605

They believe that the posts were predictive, and that we all got a one year warning. However…

>We won't telegraph our moves to the ENEMY.

>We will however light a FIRE to flush them out.

Confirmation bias: many are waiting to see HRC in cuffs, per-walked. It doesn't work that way IMHO.

>Military Intelligence.

>No media.

>No leaks.

If HRC was detained in 2017, WE WOULD NOT HAVE SEEN IT ON TV. If she has been/will be detained 2018, WE WOULD NOT SEE IT ON TV.

Watch the movie Unthinkable (2010). Military ops were NOT televised. And shouldn't be.

>>3664684

Um, yes, I know. Looks as though we've both taken this journey together, have been archiving offline for quite some time now.

>>3664718

Agreed. However, would you prefer that the general public (her die-hard fans especially) know before or after she's detained based on investigations which would then be available to the public? Or would you prefer that her die-hard "with her" fans see her perp-walked & have them hit the streets tempting the NG as they're itching to do anyway?

>>3664784

>How many believed?

Reading the board the last couple of weeks, MANY. HRC is the one who was being mocked, in this case. And we helped it along, all according to plan. YET it's never been about HRC being arrested so that we can cheer & have beers. This is SO much bigger than HRC, or Hussein, or NoName or whoever, IMHO. Fuck all of them, let's be more concerned with retaining the freedom that we almost lost because of them. God & the military can handle the rest as they see fit.

>>3664797

I nave said that ALL would remain secret. AN arrest of HRC wouldn't be publicized as breaking news on MSM, is my point.

WE HAVE MORE THAN WE KNOW, and it's our duty to educate the public. We CAN wait for Q, the slow justice system, etc, to get the info out there, OR, we can take it into our own hands, which we have been doing all along. We've been given all of this intel and found much more ourselves. What do we do with it?

USE IT

>>3664832 ← I have nothing to add to that.