Damn the breads are tasty today.

The 14th amendment debate… Shouldn't be one, considering the commentary of ''the peson that wrote it.''

>>3665073

>peson

*person

>>3665077

sup leaf.

>>3665112

>Shh sweetie

>stupid ass bot graphics

>memes that are contradicotry

>; )

>etc

>etc

It means a certain operator has certain patterns that manifest in certain ways across personas ;)

And I'm noting them :D

>>3665086

No… no, [they] do not. None of them.

>>3665183

>>3665326

If it's very retroactive then tha means most of the jobs will open back up ;)

I am strongly in favor of it being retroactive. For the record :)

>>3665344

Cutoff should be 1871. ''The year we all became slaves.''

That would also be the year that The Organic Constitution was subverted into a corporate document.

So it would be meaningful.

>>3665344

>>3665345

And to be frank, We should examine the Act of 1971 itself, before (and in concert with) looking at the Tax and IRS Acts. Those three pieces go together.

>>3665433

>1971

I meant 1871..

But bretton woods should also be examined as well, esp in 1971….

>>3665414

Interdasting catch anon..

>>3665548

kek

>>3665559

Translation: They are points of disembarkation. The turnstiles towards the exits, if you will. :D

Unless Mexico chooses to keep them. considering this → >>3665556

,I doubt the Mexicans want them, either.

>>3665600

8 gabbers stopped from gabbing

>>3665648

>>>3665556 Armed migrants in caravan opened fire on Mexican cops.

>>>3664998 Migrants open fire on Mexican cops

Duplicate sauce- use 3664998