Anonymous ID: bdd2ac Oct. 30, 2018, 12:05 p.m. No.3665875   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5890 >>5913 >>5914 >>6512

Need some help digging or thoughts in regards to fake pipe-bomb bomber's security detail.

Is Mil providing security to prevent Oswald/Ruby repeat?

 

>Drinkning my coffee this morning watching news

>News shows Cesar Sayoc being walked into courthouse

 

Man walking Sayoc in looks like an operator to me.

-No shave profile, ballcap, can headset for spec ops fast helmet

-Multi cam uniform, multi-cam body armor, blouse off-standard Army tan undershirt

This guy looks like he pulls the trigger

At first I thought patch on back of BA said FBI- Looks more like FIII to me, or something similar

 

>News footage of team bringing Sayoc out of courthouse.

-Multi cam waering team, multi cam combat shirt

-Circular patch visible on point mans sleeve

Combat shirts are usually worn downrange and are designed to provide breatheability and comfort when wearing BA for an extended period of time

Usually only worn stateside when in garrison, or on a training lane, etc.

Walking around post wearing your combat shirt is asking for some hardcore Sgt Major or First Sgt to chew ass

 

Reviewed 900 unit patches

Circular patches typical with some supply, artillery, and more commonly with MP units

Doubt they'll have gun bunnies or some supply pog

Found 1 Corrections patch which caught my interest

 

Has this guy been elevated to enemy combatant? Treason?

Why would he be in custody of MPs or Mil Corrections?

Anonymous ID: bdd2ac Oct. 30, 2018, 12:14 p.m. No.3665960   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3665914

Pump your brakes slick.

 

I'm not saying he isn't C_A, in fact, I think this may validate your point that he is C_A.

 

C_A ops are to be external from the homeland. C_A op in coordination with external/foreign individuals on the homeland would move this into treason, or enemy combatant status.

 

Thus, the military is in control, no?