I found this article interesting. They’re making some suppositions based on limited fact gleaned from hanging out at the clerk’s office. It would be nice to have some of our lawfags weigh in with their opinions. In particular, could any of the bad guys we know of replace the president in this story, and still fit in with the set of facts they have reported? Here are caps of the whole article. 1/2
Last 2 caps and the link.
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/10/31/has-robert-mueller-subpoenaed-trump-222060
Except it’s 6 days to election.
As Q has said, “the choice to know will be yours.”