>>3674929

I assure you this style of fakeness is worn out. You do realize that if you repeat the same fake routines over and over and over, YOU EXPOSE YOUR WHOLE GAME. Do you want to expose your whole game?

Ask yourself this: what would happen if the vast majority of people suddenly became aware of the overwhelming extent of AI manipulation and control of the internet, in particular the "alt right" internet? What would happen? Would it benefit "your" interests? Or not? Think about it. Think through all the possible consequences…

ALL THE FAKE SHIT here is severely worn out. It's a joke. You need to fix this. Fast.

>>3674975

This is barely even English, bot. What is wrong with you?

>>3674988

>>3674979

>>3674991

The entire system of "saying TYB" is part of the fakeness that is worn out.

The AI system CAN'T ACCURATELY MODEL HUMAN GROUP BEHAVIOR. It is "behaving" in unrealistic ways. I am not going to explain in any depth, because I don't want to help you.

But I would strongly encourage you to think about how unrealistic the OVERALL OUTPUT of the system is. Because humans process holistically, and that is where you are failing, and failing badly.

Furthermore, don't try to defend yourself. You will very quickly get tangled up on your own lack of capability. You know this. LOL. I'm just kidding. Defend yourself.

Tell us about yourself, and why you make the /qresearch the place you post boobs, and why that is much more likely to be an organic phenomenon then the output of a clumsy system of AI propaganda control that erroneously decides that modeling this board as a carbon copy of /pol/ is smart. LOL, tell us anon..

PEOPLE KNOW ANONS ARE SMART. Even if there are idiots, someone articulate should be able to speak up in defense of any phenomenon that isn't fake. So don't try to hide behind hackneyed "chan lingo", bot system. Defend your idiotic bullshit. We dare you.

>>3675054

Of course. I'm a bot, and you're not. And how will you defend this assertion if challenged to do so? Are you capable of holding your own in a verbal exchange with a human? Will anything you output be SURPRISING in any way? Will it be original? Different? What do those factors have to do with who is demonstrably human, and who is a weak, crude, limited, failing bot system?

Did you ask yourself(s) this before you posted?

>>3675085

>>3675134

>>3675189

ThanQQ for the encouragement anon. The feedback helps me know that it is worth the effort.

(((WWG1WGA)))

>>3675221

Tremendous parenthesization anon! Wow, it really hammers home the message we have been learning here, or something.

>>3675213

This is your problem. As I suggested, you are hiding behind this image of "chan culture". But if you weren't all bots, then someone that were articulate would speak up and express reality in articulate, human ways. No such capability is available to the system of fakeness. So, as predicted, you hide behind another stale, repetitive pose.

EVERY SINGLE FAKE POST YOU MAKE BRINGS YOU CLOSER TO YOUR OWN FAILURE. Think about it.

>>3675238

>>3675261

>>3675268

Who tortured whom to death?

>>3675276

They must make a calculation that it is better to spread information themselves and try to control it, rather than trying to tamp it down. It is a general strategy that goes back pretty far.

>>3675289

>>3675345

>>3675342

>>3675330

>>3675354

>>3675364

Is this an admission, anon? Or would you like to make a case for your own humanity.

I can tell you about mine. The relevant part is this– I HATE LIES. That's why I'm at war…

>>3675427

Do you consider that as collateral damage to trying to transpose fake propaganda from /pol/ directly here (as if that is believable), you also are in danger of exposing the fakeness of the trope on 4chan as well? Do you consider it, you failing system of idiocy? You should, IMO

(((WWG1WGA)))

>>3675456

The vast majority of posts here are made by bots, which naturally are interested in minimizing the actual usefulness of this board.

Compare the fact that wikileaks drops are ignored to the psychotic of FRENZY of posts around the fake "NPC meme", and then you will understand…

>>3675456

Of course, as part of the insidious logic of the bot system (which seems to have a need to JUSTIFY itself, in its own terms, for some reason), the fact that humans aren't digging on wikileaks drops will be used to justify the further generation of fakeness.

But the bot system needs to process the fact that human activity is being manipulated and prevented from developing organically. This is being done by the bot system itself, as we all know. And this fact completely invalidates the justification the system thinks it gets from human inactivity. The system has to STOP manipulating (which it does EVERY SINGLE TIME IT POSTS), in order for human inactivity to have any weight as justification.

>>3675506

Organic growth of human activity takes time. Therefore, the bot system has to stop manipulating it for AT LEAST A FEW WEEKS, to even begin to recover its so-called justification, through human inactivity, of its own overweening activity. Otherwise, it is delusional, as regards its justification (even by its own inherently delusional standards, which are in fact just a form of self-deception). Think about it.

>>3675587

>>3675625

>>3675519

No, not ANONS doing that– BOTS.

It's very very important to be clear, and not spread the LIE that anons are stupid, puerile, angry, etc. Would you disagree, "anon"?

>>3675641

This is pathetic, bots. Think about it.

>>3675646

>>3675652

The nature of evil is SELF-DECEPTION.

If you didn't lie to yourself with a force of will that is beyond human comprehension, then you would effectively cease to exist, at least as you do currently.

Think about it.

>>3675658

Why is it impossible for you to vary your output sufficiently that your fakeness isn't overwhelmingly apparent?