I'm beginning to believe that these people just have favorite words. They are programmed puppets, not heavy thinkers.
>They are bringing Fayette-nam to the cartels.
Holy shit, this caravan has no fucking clue just what's coming their way, do they?
Is this a TV show or something?
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 540a54 No.343304 📁
Feb 11 2018 19:52:44 (EST)
Anonymous ID: c6d8b9 No.343156 📁
Feb 11 2018 19:45:08 (EST)
>>343019
>Release prior to cover up.
>Public informed and collapse.
Q there is one thing that concerns me. somewhat related to this, but more related to 60/40. the less the public knows, the more likely they are to falsely assign blame in the future, possibly even generations from now. it's worth keeping in mind.
>>343156
Understand one simple fact - the US is connected to the rest of the world.
Knowing that, understand, by default, if certain intel is released it would cause a WW/mass suffering.
We share the idea of open source but value life and must make decisions base decisions on outcomes and containability.
Q
So, you don't think that Satanism, Cannibalism, The Banking Cartels, and nearly every single "conspiracy" over the internet in the past 10+ years being nearly 100% confirmed is a 60/40 reveal? Think about this for a second.
When Q does a reveal of themselves, and have to actually prove all the claims they've made, along with anons ("conspiracy "nuts"") to prove many of us here have been right about some of the most grotesque shit ever to happen on the globe as a system of control, you don't think that would absolutely cripple some people? People would be BEGGING for the truth to be concealed simply because they are too attached to a fake reality. Q is right, 99% would be in hospitals if more than what we know here were to be revealed.
Q is saying that the USA was a central component of this system of world wide subjugation. Do you want the entirety of the world to rise against the US in order to take vengeance on its people for crimes committed by people we (for the most part) didn't even elect?
Q is protecting us from that sort of wrath. Use your thinker for a sec.
Dealing with them by letter of the law puts the good guys at the moral high ground, sends a clear message to all other would-be Satanists, and establishes a new path forward for humanity.
Honestly, I love a good "vigilante" story just as must as the next movie goer, but let's get back to reality. If the US Military just went out and did the deed and "freed" humanity with the same means the cabal used to enslave it, how's that message going to be received by the world? You're literally talking about justifying the plot of "The Purge" - as long as they're bad guys, it's OK to be murderous shitbags!
Q movement is trying to stop all pain and suffering of the people of this earth, and send a message of how law and justice should carried out. Not only that, the understanding of why it needs to be that way has to be an organic movement of the people in consensus, else we'll just fall back into being the savages that the (((dividers))) make us out to be towards each other.
Worldwide pain and suffering comes from their systems of control. Ridding the globe of these monsters, in a legally binding and humane way, puts us on a plane of existence higher than them.
12 years ago, many of the anons here were supporting the Patriot Act because "if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear" while some Patriots were appalled to learn that we even still had a NSA at all. Now? The NSA are actually the good guys because the right people used the right power at the right time.
We've gone from the old school way of thinking (If you give up liberty for security you deserve neither) to a postmodern understanding of proactive crime/terror prevention. There's not a single person that took issue with Batman using everyone's cell phones to find the bad guy and stop them from killing tons of folks except Luscious Fox. Then, when he made that statement about "No one should have this much power", we all probably had the same reaction of "Well, as long as it's just for a short time to rid ourselves of the threat".
A person working in counterterrorism would argue that prevention is the cure, hence that power should always be in place, but wielded by the right people. Who's to say who are the right people? Then, we're back to the question of "Where, then, do we go from here after Q's mission is a 100% success?"
What's the contingency? How would you fix the problem permanently? Some say the only way is to educate our youths to understand what the Founding Fathers meant with quotes like this:
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure”
-Thomas Jefferson
What does that mean? You cannot have liberty if you think about proactive security measures to prevent humanity from having to worry about things like terrorism. The entire discussion is a paradox with no real "right" answer; just your opinion on what you value more; the "sense" of security, or the virtue of real liberty.