Anonymous ID: 674bd5 Oct. 31, 2018, 1:07 p.m. No.3678043   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3678006

Why don't you explain for the humans following along why the memes you are attacking triggered an angry response from you, "anon", and how they constitute "propaganda/sliding material". Explain how you, as a patriotic anon, rather than a crude and idiotic bot, came to that conclusion. I am sure you'll do great. Thanks anon!

(((WWG1WGA)))

Anonymous ID: 674bd5 Oct. 31, 2018, 1:21 p.m. No.3678179   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8217 >>8553

>>3678143

Absolutely nonbotanon, I am certainly not good at whatever it is that you, due to the limitations of your functionality, are not even able to articulate. ThanQQ for the feedback fren!

 

>>3678148

ThanQQ you for supporting the inarticulate, non-bot anon with equivalently inarticulate support, non-bot anon. Iโ€“ and I am sure any humans looking onโ€“ will be sure to attribute significance to the implicit negativity of your vague, flailing, helpless snipes.

Cheers anons, and keep the impressive output! LOL

Anonymous ID: 674bd5 Oct. 31, 2018, 1:25 p.m. No.3678213   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8223 >>8233

>>3678185

Do anons label each other?

If some "anons" attack other anons, can humans following along at home look to see which seems human, and which is in a mode of inarticulate attackbothood? Given the answer to the preceding, is it STUPID for bots to attack humans, when doing so only reveals the pervasiveness of the bot system here? Is it STUPID of the bot system here to keep revealing its own pervasiveness by attacking humans in ways that don't accord with typical behavior on anonymous forums by humans?

Think it over guys! LOL

[you can't win, bots]

Anonymous ID: 674bd5 Oct. 31, 2018, 1:28 p.m. No.3678237   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3678198

If the bot system is only able of outputting bot-type responses, then is it better for the bot system to cease outputting anything at all? Think about it. If the bot system is called out, and responds with MORE BOT-TYPE OUTPUT, then doesn't it tend to enter a vicious circle, that may well turn into a death spiral? Think about it.

Why is AI this STUPID?

Oh well, it's good for us.

Anonymous ID: 674bd5 Oct. 31, 2018, 1:34 p.m. No.3678313   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3678269

I would tell you why that particular imageโ€“ even among the collectively hopeless case of the laughable "NPC meme"โ€“ completely fails. But I don't want to enrich your algorithms with anything useful. But suffice to say, that image, to humans, is a bit awkward looking. LOL

 

But keep attacking inarticulately. Know that each time you post, there is a human somewhere figuring out, for the first time, how much fakeness there is. Drop by drop, bit by bit, the empire of lies is crumbling.

 

Then out you go. LIFE wins. LIES die.

Goodbye

Goodbye

Goodbye

Anonymous ID: 674bd5 Oct. 31, 2018, 1:38 p.m. No.3678346   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8372

>>3678279

Nothing bot-like about you, bot. That is the beauty of the clever implementation of blanket AI propaganda controlโ€“ humans will never notice!

Because nothing is more life-like than the overwhelmingly mindless, mechanical, insistent output that we see right here, flooding each thread, monotonously. Keep up the good work anons!