Anonymous ID: 24afbf Oct. 31, 2018, 4:11 p.m. No.3679873   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9891

>>3679851

Y'know, actually listening to that now, I think we've got a lame duck here.

She is kind of calling out the interviewer on not knowing the difference. Not the best term to describe the mistake: "I know they all look alike", but…not as bad as I'd been expecting from how people reacted.

Anonymous ID: 24afbf Oct. 31, 2018, 4:17 p.m. No.3679908   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9919 >>9931 >>0022

>>3679891

Oh, mate, she's a full on racist, don't get me wrong: you know she hates black people.

I'm just saying, if you tried to use this to prove to someone she was racist, they could easily argue out of it and leave an anon with nothing.

"Oh, she was just pointing out how the interviewer blah, blah, blah."

Anonymous ID: 24afbf Oct. 31, 2018, 4:22 p.m. No.3679957   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3679931

Kek. You're not wrong.

Again, I'm just pointing out, it's not the strongest piece of evidence one could use when she's literally referred to a large black woman, Donna Brazile, as a "water buffalo".

You know she was dying to call her a nigger.

Just giving anon's a heads-up of how normies will react/defend this.

Anonymous ID: 24afbf Oct. 31, 2018, 4:41 p.m. No.3680182   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0200 >>0313

>>3680140

That's right, fren.

I'm just pointing out, Q could post now and it could never be a violation of the Hatch act because Q is just a "conspiracy" to the MSM.

If they were to admit Q was in line with actual government officials, they'd also be admitting that everything Q says is true.

They'd be fucked either way.

So, yeah, Q can't break the Hatch act, until, potentially, after all this is over and done, but in that case, good luck getting that awoken society to publicly ask for the charging of the MI op officials used to gather this army.