Am I a stoner, or does every reporter's eyes look red at Fox (Ingraham's in just the interview)

I guess our friends down at the channel are getting tired of being the only news source that Trump likes, and with Trump winning this often, I wonder if anyone at Fox gets to sleep either. God Bless Fox crew, get some rest! Let Hannity do a six hour special, give everyone some shut eye and let him give an entire Q timeline report on air at primetime

www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_dChv6NVyU&t

www.youtube.com/watch?v=2T4xgnHDm08

>>3682995

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Juk7wCe0ZNg

The Ingraham interview with Trump

I guess I am stoned, am I wrong though

>>3683007

the Council of Foreign Nations has a paper called Foreign Affairs, which they tout as impartial news.

It reads like that, in a sense that the perspective of the articles feel "above" the issues resolved, as if an alien who is far more advanced in ethics and democracy is watching a game of Risk, and knows the best move for the next six turns. I'm not saying that's their position, but as a middle organization of cabal henchmen, they probably get prideful off of that. I mean, c'mon, what would the CFR sound like if it wrote articles? Don't read that shit. As for impartial news, you're at a good place to find it. Slowly redpill your friends into Q Research

>>3683074

>is new to keep him from dropping the HRC bomb

Assange's twitter was suspended today?!!

this better have already been a notable earlier today right, it had to

if not, baker better get that shit on there

>>3683099

if the Hatch Act was gonna be used here Q would already have broken that, right? Telling us to vote would be political activity, would it not? But who's saying Q is a federal official? The majority of Q is certainly military, and I don't think Q+ told us to vote

I don't think the Hatch Act is gonna do anything here, basically

https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44469.pdf

page 4 and 5 are restricted officials, closest to mil intel would be like DIA and NSA, I don't think they're runnin Q though, just flipped on our side (especially NSA) but honestly the NSA is kinda still taking our rights but hey I'm not gonna give that input, just saying that I don't think the Hatch Act affects the military, and if Q isn't military I think that step's already been taken, and they know, so if they did it then they are aware of any repercussion that exists

Finest Military Planning

>>3683169

thank you anon

puttin that shit on the wayback machine

>>3683196

I agree, but I'm not gonna worry about a Hatch Act when Q's been talkin about martial law for a while now, if there's a crime of "political interference" that Q commits in the act of the movement I'm sure that shit'll be thrown off the fuckn tower ya feel me