>>368942

'all nighter' ????

I saw that anon earlier while browsing a few links. Look at the 11th post by that anon, anon right below looks interesting as well.

id: d5949b >>361634

Didn't think there was much solid information today, but other anon at :34 in #445 is interesting enough, only 1 post. Both posts at :34

>>361807

>>361809